Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33465346›Full record

ReviewHormones and behavior2021

Convergent neuroendocrine mechanisms of social buffering and stress contagion.

Natanja F Peen, Natalia Duque-Wilckens, Brian C Trainor

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hormones and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contagion of depression: a double-edged sword.Translational psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Emotional Contagion and Social Support in Pigs with the Negative Stimulus.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natanja F PeenDepartment of Neurobiology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA. USA.
Natalia Duque-WilckensDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA. USA; Departments of Physiology and Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. USA.
Brian C TrainorDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA. USA. Electronic address: bctrainor@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Supplement: Oxytocin-department circuits of social approach and vigilanceR01MH121829 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TRAINOR, BRIAN C · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interactions play a key role in modulating the impact of stressful experiences. In some cases, social interactions can result in social buffering, the process in which the presence of one individual reduces the physiological and behavioral impact of stress in another individual. On the other hand, there is growing evidence that a key initiating factor of social buffering behaviors is the initiation of an anxiogenic state in the individual that was not directly exposed to the stress. This is referred to as stress contagion (a form of emotion contagion). Both processes involve the transmission of social information, suggesting that contagion and buffering could share similar neural mechanisms. In general, mechanistic studies of contagion and buffering are considered separately, even though behavioral studies show that a degree of contagion is usually necessary for social buffering behaviors to occur. Here we consider the extent to which the neuropeptides corticotropin releasing hormone and oxytocin are involved in contagion and stress buffering. We also assess the importance that frontal cortical areas such as the anterior cingulate cortex and infralimbic cortex play in these behavioral processes. We suggest that further work that directly compares neural mechanisms during stress contagion and stress buffering will be important for identifying what appear to be distinct but overlapping circuits mediating these processes.

Indexed as

OxytocinSocial BehaviorCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneStress, PsychologicalCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneOxytocinCorticotropin releasing factorOxytocinParaventricular nucleusPrefrontal cortexSocial defeat

Identifiers

PMID33465346
PMCPMC7965339
OpenAlexW3124949935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.