Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33465079›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Reconstructing tumor evolutionary histories and clone trees in polynomial-time with SubMARine.

Linda K Sundermann, Jeff Wintersinger, Gunnar Rätsch, Jens Stoye, Quaid Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Inferring and summarizing tumor phylogenies from bulk DNA data.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reconstructing Clonal Evolution-A Systematic Evaluation of Current Bioinformatics Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Parsimonious Clone Tree Integration in cancer.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda K SundermannDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3568-0195
Jeff WintersingerDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-9470
Gunnar RätschDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5486-8532
Jens StoyeFaculty of Technology and Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-7155
Quaid MorrisDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumors contain multiple subpopulations of genetically distinct cancer cells. Reconstructing their evolutionary history can improve our understanding of how cancers develop and respond to treatment. Subclonal reconstruction methods cluster mutations into groups that co-occur within the same subpopulations, estimate the frequency of cells belonging to each subpopulation, and infer the ancestral relationships among the subpopulations by constructing a clone tree. However, often multiple clone trees are consistent with the data and current methods do not efficiently capture this uncertainty; nor can these methods scale to clone trees with a large number of subclonal populations. Here, we formalize the notion of a partially-defined clone tree (partial clone tree for short) that defines a subset of the pairwise ancestral relationships in a clone tree, thereby implicitly representing the set of all clone trees that have these defined pairwise relationships. Also, we introduce a special partial clone tree, the Maximally-Constrained Ancestral Reconstruction (MAR), which summarizes all clone trees fitting the input data equally well. Finally, we extend commonly used clone tree validity conditions to apply to partial clone trees and describe SubMARine, a polynomial-time algorithm producing the subMAR, which approximates the MAR and guarantees that its defined relationships are a subset of those present in the MAR. We also extend SubMARine to work with subclonal copy number aberrations and define equivalence constraints for this purpose. Further, we extend SubMARine to permit noise in the estimates of the subclonal frequencies while retaining its validity conditions and guarantees. In contrast to other clone tree reconstruction methods, SubMARine runs in time and space that scale polynomially in the number of subclones. We show through extensive noise-free simulation, a large lung cancer dataset and a prostate cancer dataset that the subMAR equals the MAR in all cases where only a single clone tree exists and that it is a perfect match to the MAR in most of the other cases. Notably, SubMARine runs in less than 70 seconds on a single thread with less than one Gb of memory on all datasets presented in this paper, including ones with 50 nodes in a clone tree. On the real-world data, SubMARine almost perfectly recovers the previously reported trees and identifies minor errors made in the expert-driven reconstructions of those trees. The freely-available open-source code implementing SubMARine can be downloaded at https://github.com/morrislab/submarine.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeoplasmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33465079
PMCPMC7845980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.