Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33465066›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Modeling the structure of the frameshift-stimulatory pseudoknot in SARS-CoV-2 reveals multiple possible conformers.

Sara Ibrahim Omar, Meng Zhao, Rohith Vedhthaanth Sekar, Sahar Arbabi Moghadam, Jack A Tuszynski, Michael T Woodside

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Heterogeneous and multiple conformational transition pathways between pseudoknots of the SARS-CoV-2 frameshift element.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of coronavirus frameshifting elements: Competing stem networks explain conservation and variability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara Ibrahim OmarDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0133-3531
Meng ZhaoDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Rohith Vedhthaanth SekarDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-8016
Sahar Arbabi MoghadamDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4781-6184
Jack A TuszynskiDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9976-0429
Michael T WoodsideDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4695-0397
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus causing the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, uses -1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting (-1 PRF) to control the relative expression of viral proteins. As modulating -1 PRF can inhibit viral replication, the RNA pseudoknot stimulating -1 PRF may be a fruitful target for therapeutics treating COVID-19. We modeled the unusual 3-stem structure of the stimulatory pseudoknot of SARS-CoV-2 computationally, using multiple blind structural prediction tools followed by μs-long molecular dynamics simulations. The results were compared for consistency with nuclease-protection assays and single-molecule force spectroscopy measurements of the SARS-CoV-1 pseudoknot, to determine the most likely conformations. We found several possible conformations for the SARS-CoV-2 pseudoknot, all having an extended stem 3 but with different packing of stems 1 and 2. Several conformations featured rarely-seen threading of a single strand through junctions formed between two helices. These structural models may help interpret future experiments and support efforts to discover ligands inhibiting -1 PRF in SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

Frameshifting, RibosomalNucleic Acid ConformationComputational BiologyCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33465066
PMCPMC7845960
OpenAlexW3122439967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.