Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33464988›Full record

ArticleLanguage, speech, and hearing services in schools2021

Using Free Computer-Assisted Language Sample Analysis to Evaluate and Set Treatment Goals for Children Who Speak African American English.

Courtney Overton, Taylor Baron, Barbara Zurer Pearson, Nan Bernstein Ratner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamic Norming and Open Science.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Courtney OvertonUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Taylor BaronUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Barbara Zurer PearsonUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Nan Bernstein RatnerUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Google (United States) · US

Funding

Improving the clinical utility of preschool language sample analysisR01DC017152 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI RATNER, NAN BERNSTEIN · 2018 to 2023
$2.1M
A shared database for the study of the development of language fluencyR01DC015494 · NIDCD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MACWHINNEY, BRIAN · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015494NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Spoken language sample analysis (LSA) is widely considered to be a critical component of assessment for child language disorders. It is our best window into a preschool child's everyday expressive communicative skills. However, historically, the process can be cumbersome, and reference values against which LSA findings can be "benchmarked" are based on surprisingly little data. Moreover, current LSA protocols potentially disadvantage speakers of nonmainstream English varieties, such as African American English (AAE), blurring the line between language difference and disorder. Method We provide a tutorial on the use of free software (Computerized Language Analysis [CLAN]) enabled by the ongoing National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders-funded "Child Language Assessment Project." CLAN harnesses the advanced computational power of the Child Language Data Exchange System archive (www.childes.talkbank.org), with an aim to develop and test fine-grained and potentially language variety-sensitive benchmarks for a range of LSA measures. Using retrospective analysis of data from AAE-speaking children, we demonstrate how CLAN LSA can facilitate dialect-fair assessment and therapy goal setting. Results Using data originally collected to norm the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation, we suggest that Developmental Sentence Scoring does not appear to bias against children who speak AAE but does identify children who have language impairment (LI). Other LSA measure scores were depressed in the group of AAE-speaking children with LI but did not consistently differentiate individual children as LI. Furthermore, CLAN software permits rapid, in-depth analysis using Developmental Sentence Scoring and the Index of Productive Syntax that can identify potential intervention targets for children with developmental language disorder.

Indexed as

Child LanguageGoalsLanguageLanguage TestsBlack or African AmericanChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEducational StatusFemaleHumansLanguage DisordersMaleParentsReference ValuesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33464988
PMCPMC8711707
OpenAlexW3123845503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.