ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2021
A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures for idiopathic adhesive capsulitis - recommendations based on analyses of 16 existing questionnaires.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Impairment-based assessments for patients with lateral ankle sprain: A systematic review of measurement properties.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Experience with arthroscopic treatment of disorders in the sternoclavicular joint: A prospective series of 78 patients.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Very low dislocation rate and good clinical outcome after Bereiter trochleoplasty and additional procedures following the Copenhagen patella-femoral instability algorithm: One- and two-years outcomes from a consecutive cohort of 368 cases.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Introducing the Subjective Knee Value for Daily Activity (SKV-d) and Sport (SKV-s) as Single-Item Measures to Assess Knee Function in Athletes.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Stem cell approaches for tendon repair: delusion or insight.The Journal of physiology · 2025Review
- The structural validity of the Danish version of the Oxford Knee Score is not substantiated using Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.Bone & joint research · 2025Article
- Interportal Capsulotomy Closure Does Not Improve the Results After Hip Arthroscopy at 1-Year Follow-up: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Good rate of satisfaction but suboptimal clinical outcome at long-term follow-up in a large series of patients who had operative stabilization of the deltoid ligament of the ankle.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Good 5-year results and a low redislocation rate using an à la carte treatment algorithm for patellofemoral instability in patients with severe trochlea dysplasia.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Article
- The Significance of Selecting an Appropriate Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM): A Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Specific Paediatric International Documentation Committee Subjective (Pedi-IKDC) Knee Form.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Functional performance tests, clinical measurements, and patient-reported outcome measures do not correlate as outcomes 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Similar outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in paediatric and adult populations: a 1-year follow-up of 506 paediatric operations in Denmark.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Description of the Simple Ankle Value: A Simplified Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for the Assessment of Ankle and Hindfoot Function.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- No correlation between performance tests, clinical measurements and data from patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in children reconstructed for anterior cruciate ligament injury.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Danish VISA-P.Translational sports medicine · 2023Article
- Acetabular retroversion does not affect outcome in primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- Patient-reported outcome measures as an outcome variable in sports medicine research.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Review
- A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Choosing the most adequate PROM for a study is a non-trivial process. The aim of this study was to provide a catalogue with analyses of content and construct validity of PROMs relevant to research in sports science, including all published local translations. The most commonly used PROMs in sports research were selected from a PubMed search "patient reported outcome measures sports", identifying 439 articles and 194 different PROMs. Articles describing development of the 61 selected PROMs were assessed for content validity, and all articles regarding construct validity of each PROM and all published translations (in total 622 articles) were analyzed. A catalogue with assessments of the 61 PROMs was produced. The majority were of inferior validity, with few exceptions. The most common reason for this was that the PROM had not been developed by methods that ensure high content validity. Another major reason for inferior validity was that construct validity had not been secured by adequate statistical methods. In conclusion, this catalogue provides a tool for researchers to facilitate choosing the most valid PROM for studies in sports research. Furthermore, it shows for popular PROMs where further validation is needed, and for fields in musculoskeletal medicine where valid PROMs are lacking. It is suggested that a targeted effort is made to develop valid PROMs for major conditions in musculoskeletal research. The current method is easier to practice compared with assessment after COSMIN guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.