Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33464530›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Research advances and applications of biosensing technology for the diagnosis of pathogens in sustainable agriculture.

Qurban Ali, Sunny Ahmar, Muhammad Aamir Sohail, Muhammad Kamran, Mohsin Ali, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem, Muhammad Rizwan, Agha Mushtaque Ahmed, Freddy Mora-Poblete, Antônio Teixeira do Amaral Júnior and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Functionalized AgFeOACS omega · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Artificial Intelligence in Biological Sciences.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Toxicity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Revealing plant growth-promoting mechanisms ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Qurban AliDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, Ministry of Education, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Sunny AhmarCollege of Plant Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad Aamir SohailCollege of Plant Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad KamranKey Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China. kamiagrarian763@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0781-0332
Mohsin AliCollege of Plant Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad Hamzah SaleemCollege of Plant Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad RizwanDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Agha Mushtaque AhmedDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Crop Protection, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Hyderabad, Sindh, 70060, Pakistan.
Freddy Mora-PobleteInstitute of Biological Sciences, University of Talca, 2 Norte 685, 3460000, Talca, Chile. morapoblete@gmail.com.
Antônio Teixeira do Amaral JúniorLaboratório de Melhoramento Genético Vegetal, Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias, Universidade Estadual Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, 28013-602, Brazil.
Mustansar MubeenCollege of Plant Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Shafaqat AliDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan. shafaqataligill@yahoo.com.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNChina Medical University · TWChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKNanjing Agricultural University · CNSindh Agriculture University · PKState University of Norte Fluminense · BRUniversity of Talca · CL

Funding

Chilean National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT) 1201973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant diseases significantly impact the global economy, and plant pathogenic microorganisms such as nematodes, viruses, bacteria, fungi, and viroids may be the etiology for most infectious diseases. In agriculture, the development of disease-free plants is an important strategy for the determination of the survival and productivity of plants in the field. This article reviews biosensor methods of disease detection that have been used effectively in other fields, and these methods could possibly transform the production methods of the agricultural industry. The precise identification of plant pathogens assists in the assessment of effective management steps for minimization of production loss. The new plant pathogen detection methods include evaluation of signs of disease, detection of cultured organisms, or direct examination of contaminated tissues through molecular and serological techniques. Laboratory-based approaches are costly and time-consuming and require specialized skills. The conclusions of this review also indicate that there is an urgent need for the establishment of a reliable, fast, accurate, responsive, and cost-effective testing method for the detection of field plants at early stages of growth. We also summarized new emerging biosensor technologies, including isothermal amplification, detection of nanomaterials, paper-based techniques, robotics, and lab-on-a-chip analytical devices. However, these constitute novelty in the research and development of approaches for the early diagnosis of pathogens in sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesPlantsAgricultureAnimalsFungiLab-On-A-Chip DevicesTechnologyDetectionMicroorganismsNanomaterialsSensitivitySerological techniques

Identifiers

PMID33464530
OpenAlexW3122960594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.