Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33464476›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2021

Differential propensity of dissection along the aorta.

Ehsan Ban, Cristina Cavinato, Jay D Humphrey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ehsan BanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. ehsan.ban@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0047-3249
Cristina CavinatoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6021-8920
Jay D HumphreyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-2025
Yale University · US

Funding

Multimodality imaging-driven multifidelity modeling of aortic dissectionU01HL142518 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREY, JAY D., KARNIADAKIS, GEORGE · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL142518NIH HHS U01 HL142518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic dissections progress, in part, by delamination of the wall. Previous experiments on cut-open segments of aorta demonstrated that fluid injected within the wall delaminates the aorta in two distinct modes: stepwise progressive tearing in the abdominal aorta and a more prevalent sudden mode of tearing in the thoracic aorta that can also manifest in other regions. A microstructural understanding that delineates these two modes of tearing has remained wanting. We implemented a phase-field finite-element model of the aortic wall, motivated in part by two-photon imaging, and found correlative relations for the maximum pressure prior to tearing as a function of local geometry and material properties. Specifically, the square of the pressure of tearing relates directly to both tissue stiffness and the critical energy of tearing and inversely to the square root of the torn area; this correlation explains the sudden mode of tearing and, with the microscopy, suggests a mechanism for progressive tearing. Microscopy also confirmed that thick interlamellar radial struts are more abundant in the abdominal region of the aorta, where progressive tearing was observed previously. The computational results suggest that structurally significant radial struts increase tearing pressure by two mechanisms: confining the fluid by acting as barriers to flow and increasing tissue stiffness by holding the adjacent lamellae together. Collectively, these two phase-field models provide new insights into the mechanical factors that can influence intramural delaminations that promote aortic dissection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAorta, AbdominalAortic DissectionElastinFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonModels, CardiovascularPressureElastinDelaminationFracture energyGlycosaminoglycansRadial strutsTearing

Identifiers

PMID33464476
PMCPMC8159901
OpenAlexW3123392765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.