ArticlePediatric cardiology2021
Supravalvular and Valvular Pulmonary Stenosis: Predictive Features and Responsiveness to Percutaneous Dilation.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary root remodeling procedure for symptomatic supravalvular pulmonary stenosis in an adult patient who underwent pulmonary artery banding: a case report.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes of the neonates with critical pulmonary stenosis: intrauterine versus postnatal transport.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- A Novel Mutation in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- [[Supravalvular pulmonary stenosis as a manifestation of a mediastinal germ cell tumor: a case report]].Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Supravalvular pulmonary stenosis (SVPS) is considered a rare form of pulmonary stenosis (PS) and represents both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. There currently exist no reliable echocardiographic criteria to accurately predict the supravalvular form. The aims of the study were to describe the response to treatment of the different PS presentations and to outline the diagnostic capacity of echocardiogram to differentiate the SVPS from valvular PS (VPS). This retrospective study included 106 patients who underwent percutaneous angioplasty between 2006 and 2017. Interventional outcomes of patients with SVPS were compared to those of patients with VPS. Diagnosis of VPS vs. SVPS by echocardiogram was compared to diagnosis obtained by angiogram. Echocardiogram yielded a sensitivity of 56%, a specificity of 82.5%, a positive predictive value of 50%, and a negative predictive value of 85.7%. Patients with SVPS had a significantly smaller pulmonary artery to pulmonary valve (PA:PV) ratio. At 6-12 months of follow-up, the VPS group had a mean right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) gradient of 21.68 ± 19.85 mmHg compared to 45.27 ± 24.58 mmHg in the SVPS group. Patients with SVPS had a higher rate of reintervention than patients with VPS (32% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in major complications between groups, whereas VPS patients had a higher proportion of pulmonary insufficiency. Percutaneous angioplasty for PS is less effective in patients with a supravalvular component. A better understanding of the underlying histopathology of different PS subtypes could lead to development of different techniques to improve outcomes, with fewer reinterventions, in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.