Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33464364›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Do antispasmodics or rectal enemas improve image quality on multiparametric prostate MRI? An 'Evidence-Based Practice' review of the literature.

Daniel L Brennan, Smaro Lazarakis, Allan Lee, Teng H Tan, Kwang Y Chin, Sheng F Oon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dealing with rectum motion during radiotherapy: How can we anticipate it?Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Abbreviated MR Protocols in Prostate MRI.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel L BrennanDepartment of Cancer Imaging, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Smaro LazarakisHealth Sciences Library, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health Division of Cancer Surgery, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Allan LeeDepartment of Cancer Imaging, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Teng H TanDepartment of Cancer Imaging, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kwang Y ChinDepartment of Cancer Imaging, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sheng F OonDepartment of Cancer Imaging, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. sheng.oon@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-9405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate is increasingly used for the preoperative detection and staging of prostate cancer. Image quality of prostate mpMRI can be significantly degraded by motion related artefact due to bowel peristalsis and susceptibility related artefact, which reduces cancer detection sensitivity. The use of several different methods including anstispasmodic medications and rectal enemas were proposed as potential methods to reduce mpMRI artefacts, but current recommendations in the scientific literature are conflicting and inconsistent. This article seeks to identify the best available evidence to determine which patient preparation method is most effective in improving prostate mpMRI, and provides recommendations for further areas of research. We used the five-step 'Evidence-Based Practice' systematic approach of 'Ask, Search, Appraise, Apply and Evaluate' described by the McMaster University and National Health Service for critical appraisal of topics. We developed a focused clinical question using a PICO format, and performed a primary and secondary literature search through Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley). All identified articles were appraised for strength and validity. Seven articles were retrieved which demonstrated conflicting sensitivities and specificities for intravenous hyoscine butylbromide and rectal enema in improving image susceptibility artefact, motion artefact, and anatomic distortion on the T2 or diffusion weighted imaging sequences. Intravenous hysoscine butylbromide is the optimum patient preparation method for improving T2W and DWI image quality in prostate mpMRI. The use of a preparatory rectal enema is not currently recommended, but better quality studies are required.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsEnemaEvidence-Based PracticeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParasympatholyticsProstateState MedicineParasympatholyticsMagnetic resonance imagingPIRADSProstate cancerRadiologyUrology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.