ArticleHerz2021
Predictors of adequate intraprocedural premature ventricular complex (PVC) frequency during idiopathic PVC ablation.
Article in Herz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dependence of premature ventricular complexes on heart rate-it's not that simple.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- The utility of 24-h electrocardiogram recordings for the prediction of a sufficient number of premature ventricular complexes and mapping strategy during catheter ablation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Premature Ventricular Complex (PVC) Burden on the Left Ventricle in the Structurally Normal Heart: Hemodynamic Alterations of Idiopathic PVC on Echocardiography.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present study was to determine the predictors of adequate intraprocedural premature ventricular complex (PVC) frequency for successful mapping and ablation of idiopathic PVCs.
methodsA total of 101 consecutive patients (45 men; age: 47.9 ± 14.2 years) who had undergone idiopathic PVC ablation between 01 November 2018 and 24 June 2020 constituted our study population. Clinical and demographic data, procedural details and 24 h rhythm recordings that had been recorded before the procedure were retrospectively evaluated. Total PVC burden and diurnal variability assessed by the ratio of night time (22:00-06:00) over day time (06:00-22:00) PVC burden was calculated. The relationship between hourly PVC number and heart rate was also evaluated for each patient. Clinical characteristics and Holter parameters were compared between groups with and without adequate intraprocedural frequency of PVCs that permitted activation mapping.
resultsIn all, 27 patients (26.7%) had infrequent intraprocedural PVCs which necessitated isoproterenol infusion or cancellation of ablation procedure due to inability of activation mapping. PVC burden was significantly higher in the group with frequent intraprocedural PVCs (26.1 ± 9.4% vs 21.2 ± 10.3%; p: 0.026). There were no significant differences between groups regarding the relationship between hourly PVC number and heart rate or the ratio of night/day PVC burden. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed the 24 h Holter PVC burden as the sole parameter that is significant predictor of frequent intraprocedural PVCs permitting activation mapping.
conclusionThe 24 h PVC burden was the only predictor of adequate intraprocedural PVC frequency permitting activation mapping during idiopathic PVC ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33464357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.