Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33464206›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Digital Health Tools for Managing Noncommunicable Diseases During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Patients and Caregivers.

Alessandro Monaco, Katie Palmer, Nicolaj Holm Ravn Faber, Irene Kohler, Mitchell Silva, Anita Vatland, Joop van Griensven, Mariano Votta, Donna Walsh, Vincent Clay and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Alessandro MonacoÉcole des hautes études commerciales de Paris (HEC Paris), Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9941-7003
Katie PalmerOliba, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8783-016X
Nicolaj Holm Ravn FaberThe Danish Committee for Health Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2330-2952
Irene KohlerHealthwatch Wiltshire, Trowbridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4723-1503
Mitchell SilvaEsperity, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-4238
Anita VatlandPårørendealliansen, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1825-5429
Joop van GriensvenPain Alliance Europe, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-6824
Mariano VottaCittadinanzattiva/Active Citizenship Network, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7557-2546
Donna WalshEuropean Federation of Neurological Associations, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0028-0818
Vincent ClayUpjohn, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4907-003X
Mehmet Cuneyt YaziciogluUpjohn, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3638-403X
Danute DucinskieneUpjohn, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-9070-5810
Shaantanu DondeUpjohn, Surrey, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7272-7389
Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship · ITDanish Medical Association · DKEuropean Society of Intensive Care Medicine · BEHEC Paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA reduction in the number of face-to-face medical examinations conducted for patients with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to health care professionals quickly adopting different strategies to communicate with and monitor their patients. Such strategies include the increased use of digital health tools. However, patient preferences, privacy concerns, a lack of regulations, overregulation, and insufficient evidence on the efficacy of digital health tools may have hampered the potential positive benefits of using such tools to manage NCDs.

objectiveThis viewpoint aims to discuss the views of an advisory board of patient and caregiver association members. Specifically, we aim to present this advisory board's view on the role of digital health tools in managing patients with NCDs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify future directions based on patients' perspectives.

methodsAs an initiative under the NCD Partnership (PARTners in Ncds Engage foR building Strategies to improve Healthy ageing In Patients) model of Upjohn, a web-based advisory board of patient and caregiver advocates was held on July 28, 2020, to bring together key stakeholders from public and private sectors.

resultsThe following key themes emerged: (1) technology developers should understand that the goals of patients may differ from those of health care professionals and other stakeholders; (2) patients, health care professionals, caregivers, and other end users need to be involved in the development of digital health tools at the earliest phase possible, to guarantee usability, efficacy, and adoption; (3) digital health tools must be better tailored to people with complex conditions, such as multimorbidity, older age, and cognitive or sensory impairment; and (4) some patients do not want or are unable to use digital health care tools, so adequate alternatives should always be available.

conclusionsThere was consensus that public-private partnership models, such as the Upjohn NCD Partnership, can be effective models that foster innovation by integrating multiple perspectives (eg, patients' perspectives) into the design, development, and implementation of digital and nondigital health tools, with the main overall objective of improving the life of patients with NCDs.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAgedAge FactorsCaregiversCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareHumansMiddle AgedNoncommunicable DiseasesPandemicsPatient SatisfactionPrivacySARS-CoV-2TelemedicineageingcaregiversCOVID-19digital healthdigital toolhealth technologiesinformation and communication technologiesnoncommunicable diseasespatient advocacypatient empowermentpatient perspectiveperspectiveSARS-CoV-2telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33464206
PMCPMC7850778
OpenAlexW3118550390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.