Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33464122›Full record

ReviewFuture microbiology2021

Review of the use of nasal and oral antiseptics during a global pandemic.

Christopher Stathis, Nikolas Victoria, Kristin Loomis, Shaun A Nguyen, Maren Eggers, Edward Septimus, Nasia Safdar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Virucidal Effect of Povidone Iodine on SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharynx: An Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher StathisHHV-6 Foundation, Santa Barbara, CA 93108, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8205-5125
Nikolas VictoriaHHV-6 Foundation, Santa Barbara, CA 93108, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-6384
Kristin LoomisHHV-6 Foundation, Santa Barbara, CA 93108, USA.
Shaun A NguyenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Maren EggersProf Dr G Enders MVZ Laboratory & Institute of Virology, Infectious Diseases, Stuttgart, BW 70193, Germany.
Edward SeptimusDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School & the Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Nasia SafdarDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA & The William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI 53726, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A review of nasal sprays and gargles with antiviral properties suggests that a number of commonly used antiseptics including povidone-iodine, Listerine

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalCarrageenanChlorhexidineCOVID-19Drug CombinationsHydrogen PeroxideNasal SpraysOils, VolatilePovidone-IodineSalicylatesSARS-CoV-2TerpenesViral LoadAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCarrageenanChlorhexidineDrug CombinationsHydrogen PeroxideListerineNasal SpraysOils, VolatilePovidone-IodineSalicylatesTerpeneschlorhexidineCOVID-19hydrogen peroxidehypertonic salineiota-carrageenannasal sprayoral rinsepovidone-iodinerespiratory infectionsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33464122
PMCPMC7842245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.