Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33464043›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2021

Prime Editing Guide RNA Design Automation Using PINE-CONE.

Kylie Standage-Beier, Stefan J Tekel, David A Brafman, Xiao Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Prime Editing of Mouse Primary Neurons.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR technologies for genome, epigenome and transcriptome editing.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. The Development, Optimization and Future of Prime Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Research progress in mitochondrial gene editing technology.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Prime editing in hematopoietic stem cells-FromFrontiers in genome editing · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Prime Editing: An All-Rounder for Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Dual-AAV delivering split prime editor system for in vivo genome editing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  20. Prime Editing for Precise Genome Engineering in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kylie Standage-Beier
Stefan J Tekel
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Investigating the mechanisms of a multi-state model of Wnt signalingR01GM121698 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BRAFMAN, DAVID A · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Forward engineering to understand gene regulatory network topologiesR01GM106081 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI WANG, XIAO · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Predictive Modeling of Pattern Formation Driven by Synthetic Gene NetworksR01GM131405 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUANG, YANG · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
Generation and characterization of isogenic hiPSC lines with various APOE genotypesR21AG056706 · NIA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BRAFMAN, DAVID A · 2017 to 2018
$409k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG056706NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106081NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121698NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-based technologies are paramount in genome engineering and synthetic biology. Prime editing (PE) is a technology capable of installing genomic edits without double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) or donor DNA. Prime editing guide RNAs (pegRNAs) simultaneously encode both guide and edit template sequences. They are more design intensive than CRISPR single guide RNAs (sgRNAs). As such, application of PE technology is hindered by the limited throughput of manual pegRNA design. To that end, we designed a software tool, Prime Induced Nucleotide Engineering Creator of New Edits (PINE-CONE), that enables high-throughput automated design of pegRNAs and prime editing strategies. PINE-CONE translates edit coordinates and sequences into pegRNA designs, accessory guides, and oligonucleotides for facile cloning workflows. To demonstrate PINE-CONE's utility in studying disease-relevant genotypes, we rapidly design a library of pegRNAs targeting Alzheimer's Disease single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Overall, PINE-CONE will accelerate the application of PEs in synthetic biology and biomedical research.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsSoftwareAnimalsAutomationCaenorhabditis elegansClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDrosophila melanogasterGene EditingGenomeHumansMiceOligonucleotidesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA EditingDNAOligonucleotidesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsautomationCRISPRgenome engineeringprime editing

Identifiers

PMID33464043
PMCPMC7901017
OpenAlexW3125658303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.