Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463912›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2021

Greater increase in internal carotid artery shear rate during aerobic interval compared to continuous exercise in healthy adult men.

Shigehiko Ogoh, Takuro Washio, Kazuya Suzuki, Motoyuki Iemitsu, Takeshi Hashimoto, Erika Iwamoto, Damian M Bailey

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Handgrip exercise does not alter COExperimental physiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Utility of High Intensity Interval Training to Improve Cognitive Aging in Heart Disease Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shigehiko OgohDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Toyo University, Kawagoe-Shi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5297-6468
Takuro WashioDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Toyo University, Kawagoe-Shi, Japan.
Kazuya SuzukiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Toyo University, Kawagoe-Shi, Japan.
Motoyuki IemitsuFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan.
Takeshi HashimotoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan.
Erika IwamotoSchool of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Damian M BaileyNeurovascular Research Laboratory, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0498-7095
Ritsumeikan University · JPToyo University · JPUniversity of South Wales · GBSapporo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interval exercise has been determined to be more effective than continuous exercise for achieving improvement in the cardiovascular function of individuals suffering from cardiovascular disease. However, whether interval exercise improves the cerebrovascular function remains unclear. As per our hypothesis, interval exercise induces a higher cerebrovascular shear rate (SR) than continuous exercise. In this study, 11 adult men randomly performed continuous exercise for 12 min or work-equivalent (57.6 kJ/exercise session) interval exercise of semi-recumbent cycling. The SR in the internal carotid artery (ICA) represents an index of the cerebrovascular SR, which was measured during both the exercises using Doppler ultrasonography. Both the aerobic exercise modes increased the ICA SR. Moreover, the average ICA SR of the interval exercise for the final 4 min of exercise or 2 min of recovery was significantly higher than that for continuous exercise (exercise, 351 ± 75 vs. 330 ± 61/s, p = .038; recovery, 327 ± 86 vs. 290 ± 56/s, p = .014). To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that aerobic interval exercise increased the ICA SR more than equivalent work volume of aerobic continuous exercise. Thus, aerobic interval exercise may be more effective at stimulating the cerebrovasculature, resulting in greater improvements in cerebrovascular function as compared to continuous aerobic exercise in healthy adult men. These findings provide some important information that would help enhance exercise therapy programs for patients with arteriosclerosis, especially in the cerebral circulation.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingAdultAerobiosisCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaCarotid Artery, InternalCerebrovascular CirculationExerciseHumansMaleRegional Blood FlowStress, MechanicalYoung Adultcerebral blood flowendothelial functionhumansinternal carotid arteryshear stress

Identifiers

PMID33463912
PMCPMC7814484
OpenAlexW3122719705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.