Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463719›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2021

Clinical validation of a second generation anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM automated chemiluminescent immunoassay.

Massimo Pieri, Marzia Nuccetelli, Eleonora Nicolai, Serena Sarubbi, Sandro Grelli, Sergio Bernardini

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Massimo PieriDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3463-0268
Marzia NuccetelliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora NicolaiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Serena SarubbiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Sandro GrelliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Sergio BernardiniDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has proven to be extremely contagious and has spread rapidly all over the world. A key aspect in limiting the virus diffusion is to ensure early and accurate diagnosis. Serological assays could be an alternative in increasing testing capabilities, particularly when used as part of an algorithmic approach combined with molecular analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a second generation chemiluminescent automated immunoassay able to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies. Data are carried out on healthy subjects and other infectious diseases pre-pandemic sera, as controls, and on two different coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalized patient groups (early and late infection time). Data obtained have been analyzed in terms of precision, linearity, sensitivity and specificity. Specificities are: 100% for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and 98% for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM, in all patient groups. Sensitivities are: 97%, 100%, and 98% for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and 87%, 83%, and 86% for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM in the early infection, in the late infection and in the total patient group, respectively. The Mindray anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM assays demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity, indicating that IgG and IgM simultaneous detection is useful even in the early phases of infection.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingCross ReactionsFemaleHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MImmunologic TestsMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2biochemical analysiscoronavirusSARS coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID33463719
PMCPMC8013349
OpenAlexW3124728764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.