Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463691›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Persistent inequitable design and implementation of patient portals for users at the margins.

Nicole S Goedhart, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, Joey Woudstra, Jacqueline E W Broerse, Afke Wieke Betten, Christine Dedding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Moving beyond barriers: a mixed-method study to develop evidence-based strategies to improve implementation of PROMs in clinical oncology care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The value of community-integrated health information exchanges: three recent examples from El Paso, Texas.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Telehealth experiences of providers and patients who use augmentative and alternative communication.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole S GoedhartAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Teun Zuiderent-JerakAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Joey WoudstraAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jacqueline E W BroerseAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Afke Wieke BettenInstitute for Science in Society, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Christine DeddingDepartment of Ethics, Law, and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiane Forsythe and other feminist scholars have long shown how system builders' tacit assumptions lead to the systematic erasure of certain users from the design process. In spite of this phenomena being known in the health informatics literature for decades, recent research shows how patient portals and electronic patients health records continue to reproduce health inequalities in Western societies. To better understand this discrepancy between scholarly awareness of such inequities and mainstream design, this study unravels the (conceptual) assumptions and practices of designers and others responsible for portal implementation in the Netherlands and how citizens living in vulnerable circumstances are included in this process. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews (n = 24) and questionnaires (n = 14) with portal designers, health professionals, and policy advisors.

resultsIn daily design practices, equity is seen as an "end-of-the-pipeline" concern. Respondents identify health care professionals rather than patients as their main users. If patients are included in the design, this generally entails patients in privileged positions. The needs of citizens living in vulnerable circumstances are not prioritized in design processes. Developers legitimize their focus with reference to the innovation-theoretical approach of the Diffusion of Innovations. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionAlthough feminist scholars have developed important understandings of the exclusion of citizens living in vulnerable circumstances from portal design, other academic efforts have profoundly shaped daily practices of portal development. Diane Forsythe would likely have taken up this discrepancy as a challenge by finding ways to translate these insights into mainstream systems design.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Records, PersonalPatient PortalsAttitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesVulnerable Populationsfeminisminequitable designminority grouppatient engagementPatient portals

Identifiers

PMID33463691
PMCPMC7883982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.