Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463590›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Changing trends in the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) biosimilars: Insights from the Vitreoretinal Society of India Biosimilars of Anti-VEGF Survey.

Jay U Sheth, Michael W Stewart, Manoj Khatri, Shashank R Gupta, Shobhit Chawla, Anand Rajendran, Raja Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Anti-VEGF and Other Novel Therapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jay U ShethDepartment of Vitreoretinal Services, Surya Eye Institute and Research Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Michael W StewartDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Manoj KhatriDepartment of Vitreoretina, Eydox Eye Hospital and Rajan Eye Care Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shashank R GuptaFounder Chairman and Vitreoretina Surgeon, Delhi Eye Care, New Delhi, India.
Shobhit ChawlaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Prakash Netra Kendr, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh; Department of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Society of India (VRSI), Hyderabad, India.
Anand RajendranDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Society of India (VRSI), Hyderabad; Retina-Vitreous Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Raja NarayananDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Society of India (VRSI); Suven Clinical Research Center, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to present the outcomes of the 2018 and 2020 Vitreo-retinal Society of India (VRSI) biosimilars of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (VIBE) surveys. Methods: An online survey of members of VRSI was conducted in July 2018 and January 2020 regarding their practice-patterns on anti-VEGF biosimilars pertaining to safety, efficacy, pricing, and need for enhanced clinical trials before regulatory approval. Results: In 2018, 112 VRSI members participated, whereas in 2020, 98 society members participated. In both surveys, majority of respondents were aware of biosimilars (96%, 2018 vs. 100%, 2020; P = 0.9) and felt that approval of biosimilar drugs should be made more stringent with larger clinical trials (89%, 2018 vs. 91%, 2020; P = 0.93). An increase in use of ranibizumab-biosimilar (41%, 2018 to 56%, 2020; P = 0.2) and a simultaneous significant decline in use of bevacizumab-biosimilar (9%, 2018 to 2%, 2020; P = 0.04) was noted from 2018 to 2020. From 2018 to 2020, the proportion of respondents satisfied with safety (61% to 68%; P = 0.59) and efficacy (65% to 81%; P = 0.32) of ranibizumab-biosimilar increased. However, during the same period, we noted in reduction in satisfaction levels with safety of bevacizumab-biosimilar (30% to 25%; P = 0.54), whereas satisfaction with its efficacy was stable (29% vs 30%; P = 0.99). A substantial proportion of retina specialists considered that current cost of ranibizumab-biosimilar ($130) was sufficiently low for it to be used as a substitute for Avastin (37%, 2018 and 40%, 2020; P = 0.82). Conclusion: The VRSI surveys reveal that Indian vitreoretinal specialists are familiar with anti-VEGF biosimilars. There was a progressive trend favoring ranibizumab-biosimilar over bevacizumab-biosimilar. One-third of the participants deem the current price of ranibizumab-biosimilar as appropriate to replace Avastin. Simultaneously, the need for enhanced pharmacovigilance and larger clinical trials are warranted for regulatory approval of these agents.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabHumansIndiaRanibizumabSurveys and QuestionnairesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABevacizumabbiosimilarsranibizumabRazumabVitreoretinal Society of India

Identifiers

PMID33463590
PMCPMC7933895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.