Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463565›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Current intravitreal therapy and ocular hypertension: A review.

Aditya Sudhalkar, Alper Bilgic, Shail Vasavada, Laurent Kodjikian, Thibaud Mathis, Fransesc March de Ribot, Thanos Papakostas, Viraj Vasavada, Vaishali Vasavada, Samaresh Srivastava and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intravitreal injection delivered volume under different environmental and training conditions.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intraocular pressure: Focus on corticosteroids.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Aditya SudhalkarAlphavision Augenzentrum, Bremerhaven, Germany; Raghudeep Eye Hospital, Ahmedabad; MS Sudhalkar Medical Research Foundation, Baroda, India.
Alper BilgicAlphavision Augenzentrum, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Shail VasavadaRaghudeep Eye Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Laurent KodjikianCroix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France; UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, Villeurbane, France, Universitat de Autonoma, Barcelona, Spain.
Thibaud MathisCroix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France; UMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, Villeurbane, France, Universitat de Autonoma, Barcelona, Spain.
Fransesc March de RibotUMR-CNRS 5510 Matéis, Villeurbane, France, Universitat de Autonoma, Barcelona, Spain.
Thanos PapakostasWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States of America.
Viraj VasavadaRaghudeep Eye Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Vaishali VasavadaRaghudeep Eye Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Samaresh SrivastavaRaghudeep Eye Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Deepak BhojwaniRaghudeep Eye Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Pooja GhiaMS Sudhalkar Medical Research Foundation, Baroda, India.
Anand SudhalkarMS Sudhalkar Medical Research Foundation, Baroda, India.
Raghudeep Eye Hospital · INHospices Civils de Lyon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRWeatherford College · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the effect of commonly used intravitreal agents on immediate and long-term IOP elevations and their association, if any, with glaucoma. Literature searches in PubMed and the Cochrane databased in January 2020 yielded 407 individual articles. Of these, 87 were selected for review based on our inclusion criteria. Based on the evidence provided, 20 were assigned level I, 27 level II, and 22 level III. Eight articles were rejected because of poor quality, insufficient clarity, or irrelevance based on standardized protocols set out by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. The studies that reported on short-term IOP elevation (i.e., between 0 and 60 min) showed that an immediate increase in IOP is seen in all patients who receive anti-VEGF agents or triamcinolone acetonide when measured between 0 and 30 min of intravitreal injection and that the IOP elevation decreases over time. The data on long-term IOP elevation were mixed; Pretreatment with glaucoma medications, anterior chamber tap, vitreous reflux, longer intervals between injections, and longer axial lengths were associated with lower IOP elevations after injection of anti-VEGF agents, while the position of the implant vis-à-vis, the anterior chamber was important for steroid therapy. Data were mixed on the relationship between IOP increase and the type of intravitreal injection, number of intravitreal injections, preexisting glaucoma, and globe decompression before injection. There were no data on the onset or progression of glaucoma in the studies reviewed in this assessment. However, some studies demonstrated RNFL thinning in patients receiving chronic anti-VEGF therapy. Most, if not all, intravitreal agents cause ocular hypertension, both in the short term and long term. The functional consequences of these observations are not very clear.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOcular HypertensionAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabHumansIntraocular PressureIntravitreal InjectionsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGF agentdrug volumeintraocular pressureranibizumab

Identifiers

PMID33463565
PMCPMC7933876
OpenAlexW3125889160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.