Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463554›Full record

ReviewEndoscopic ultrasound

EUS-guided pancreatic ductal intervention: A comprehensive literature review.

Zarak Khan, Umar Hayat, Sharareh Moraveji, Douglas G Adler, Ali A Siddiqui

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zarak KhanDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Mary Mercy Hospital, Livonia, MI, USA.
Umar HayatDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sharareh MoravejiDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Douglas G AdlerDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ali A SiddiquiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University · USMercy Medical Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EUS has opened a new frontier in endoscopic techniques for accessing pancreatic ducts in patients with failed ERCP. The major indications of EUS-guided pancreatic duct intervention (EUS-PDI) are main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures due to chronic pancreatitis or strictures of pancreaticojejunal or pancreaticogastric anastomosis after Whipple resection, which lead to recurrent acute pancreatitis. EUS-guided pancreaticogastro or duodenostomy offers an alternative to surgery when transpapillary drainage fails or is not possible. We provide an expert commentary and a brief overview on this relatively novel technique utilizing EUS-PDI creation in patients with impaired drainage of the MPD who have failed other conventional endoscopic techniques for MPD drainage and either are poor surgical candidates or are reluctant to undergo surgery.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitisendosonographyinterventional endosonography

Identifiers

PMID33463554
PMCPMC8098848
OpenAlexW3120043391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.