Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463171›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2020

Gelatin-Based Microribbon Hydrogels Support Robust MSC Osteogenesis across a Broad Range of Stiffness.

Bogdan Conrad, Camila Hayashi, Fan Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bogdan ConradProgram of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edward Building Room 114, Stanford, California94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-099X
Camila HayashiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University Shriram Center, Room 129, Stanford, California94305, United States.
Fan YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University300 Pasteur Drive, Edward Building Room 114, Stanford, California94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-0403
Stanford University · US

Funding

Microribbon scaffold-mediated Immunomodulation for Cranial Bone RepairR01DE024772 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, FAN · 2015 to 2025
$4.6M
Sliding hydrogels for accelerating cartilage regenerationR01AR074502 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, FAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
Injectable Macroporous Matrices to Enhance Stem Cell Survival and Craniofacial RepairF31DE025788 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CONRAD, BOGDAN · 2016 to 2018
$109k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074502NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE025788NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaffold macroporosity has been shown to be critical for promoting bone regeneration. Although injectable materials are preferred for minimally invasive delivery, conventional macroporous scaffolds were not injectable and do not support homogeneous cell encapsulation. We recently reported a gelatin-based microribbon (μRB) scaffold that offers macroporosity while also supporting homogeneous cell encapsulation. Compared to conventional gelatin hydrogels, macroporous gelatin μRB scaffolds demonstrated great advantage in enhancing mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based cartilage formation. However, whether gelatin-based μRBs support MSC osteogenesis and bone formation remains unknown. The goal of this study is to assess the potential of gelatin-based μRBs for supporting MSC-based osteogenesis and bone formation in vitro. Given recent evidence from the literature that osteogenesis is sensitive to substrate stiffness, we further investigate how varying μRB stiffness modulates MSC osteogenesis. We first determine the maximal stiffness range of gelatin μRBs that can be fabricated (13-57 kPa), which supports both retention of μRB shape and macroporosity within scaffolds after inter-cross-linking. Interestingly, varying μRB stiffness across a broad range of stiffness did not significantly impact osteogenesis, with all groups supporting upregulation of bone markers and extensive collagen deposition. All gelatin μRBs also supported a comparable level of cell spreading and upregulation of mechanosensing markers. However, soft μRB (13 kPa) scaffolds did not maintain structural integrity and condensed into a pellet over time. Both intermediate and stiff gelatin μRB-based scaffolds maintained their integrity and supported robust bone formation, leading to a more than 10-fold increase in the compressive moduli of engineered bone after 5 weeks of culture in osteogenic media. Incorporating hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticle coating onto the gelatin μRB surface further accelerated the maturation of MSCs into osteoblasts and mineralization. Together, these results validate that gelatin μRBs can support MSC osteogenesis across a broad range of stiffness and offers an injectable macroporous scaffold for enhancing stem-cell-based bone regeneration.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisGelatinHydrogelsTissue ScaffoldsGelatinHydrogelsbonegelatinmacroporousmesenchymal stem cellsscaffoldsstiffness

Identifiers

PMID33463171
PMCPMC10154176
OpenAlexW3019837908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.