ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2020
Gelatin-Based Microribbon Hydrogels Support Robust MSC Osteogenesis across a Broad Range of Stiffness.
Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ribbon-shaped microgels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting of anisotropic tissue structures.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapies: Challenges and Enhancement Strategies.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Donor Variability and 3D Culture Models Influence Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2026Article
- Human Endometrial Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel Facilitated Endometrial Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Endometrial Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Biomechanical research using advanced micro-nano devices: In-Vitro cell Characterization focus.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Personalized composite scaffolds for accelerated cell- and growth factor-free craniofacial bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Vascular smooth muscle cells can be circumferentially aligned inside a channel using tunable gelatin microribbons.Biofabrication · 2024Article
- Macroporous Granular Hydrogels Functionalized with Aligned Architecture and Small Extracellular Vesicles Stimulate Osteoporotic Tendon-To-Bone Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Article
- Stem Cell Membrane-Coated Microribbon Scaffolds Induce Regenerative Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in a Critical-Size Cranial Bone Defect Model.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2023Article
- Integrating physicomechanical and biological strategies for BTE: biomaterials-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.Theranostics · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Macroporous Hydrogels for Cell Behavior and Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The effect of LyPRP/collagen composite hydrogel on osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Scaffold macroporosity has been shown to be critical for promoting bone regeneration. Although injectable materials are preferred for minimally invasive delivery, conventional macroporous scaffolds were not injectable and do not support homogeneous cell encapsulation. We recently reported a gelatin-based microribbon (μRB) scaffold that offers macroporosity while also supporting homogeneous cell encapsulation. Compared to conventional gelatin hydrogels, macroporous gelatin μRB scaffolds demonstrated great advantage in enhancing mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based cartilage formation. However, whether gelatin-based μRBs support MSC osteogenesis and bone formation remains unknown. The goal of this study is to assess the potential of gelatin-based μRBs for supporting MSC-based osteogenesis and bone formation in vitro. Given recent evidence from the literature that osteogenesis is sensitive to substrate stiffness, we further investigate how varying μRB stiffness modulates MSC osteogenesis. We first determine the maximal stiffness range of gelatin μRBs that can be fabricated (13-57 kPa), which supports both retention of μRB shape and macroporosity within scaffolds after inter-cross-linking. Interestingly, varying μRB stiffness across a broad range of stiffness did not significantly impact osteogenesis, with all groups supporting upregulation of bone markers and extensive collagen deposition. All gelatin μRBs also supported a comparable level of cell spreading and upregulation of mechanosensing markers. However, soft μRB (13 kPa) scaffolds did not maintain structural integrity and condensed into a pellet over time. Both intermediate and stiff gelatin μRB-based scaffolds maintained their integrity and supported robust bone formation, leading to a more than 10-fold increase in the compressive moduli of engineered bone after 5 weeks of culture in osteogenic media. Incorporating hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticle coating onto the gelatin μRB surface further accelerated the maturation of MSCs into osteoblasts and mineralization. Together, these results validate that gelatin μRBs can support MSC osteogenesis across a broad range of stiffness and offers an injectable macroporous scaffold for enhancing stem-cell-based bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.