Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463040›Full record

ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2021

Outcome of peri-implant maintenance care in patients with an implant-supported lower denture-A 3.5-year retrospective analysis.

Pieter Leo van der Moolen, Ben Jeroen Post, Dagmar Else Slot, Fridus August van der Weijden

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pieter Leo van der MoolenDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-1787
Ben Jeroen PostDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dagmar Else SlotDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-0037
Fridus August van der WeijdenDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-8384
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplant-supported overdentures represent a successful treatment for edentulous patients. As early diagnosis, detection and supportive care are considered key factors for the prevention of peri-implant diseases, consistent maintenance of these implants is becoming increasingly relevant. PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis evaluated a cohort of edentulous patients with a mandibular implant-supported overdenture over a period of 3.5 years during which the peri-implant tissues were assessed. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 108 patients that had consistently adhered to the annual maintenance appointments was selected. The clinical peri-implant pocket probing depth (PiPPD) and peri-implant bleeding on probing score (PiBOP) were investigated. Data from the 3.5-year follow-up were compared to data from the baseline assessment.

resultsA 100% implant survival was reported after 3.5 years. The mean PiBOP showed a significant decrease over time (P = .028). The mean PiPPD was found significantly deeper for male patients both at baseline (P = .004) and 3.5-year follow-up (P < .001). Besides, the PiPPD for locator anchorages was found significantly deeper compared to ball anchorages at the 3.5-year follow-up (P = .026).

conclusionIn those patients that adhered to the annual maintenance visits during the 3.5 years after implant surgery a stable peri-implant condition was observed. As future consideration, the comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients participating in the maintenance program with those that did not would make this observation even more meaningful.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsJaw, EdentulousDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, OverlayDenture RetentionFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMandibleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDental Implantsbleeding on probingedentulous mandibleimplant-supported overdenturenon complianceperi-implant tissuespocket probing depthsupportive care

Identifiers

PMID33463040
PMCPMC8247953
OpenAlexW3125565628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.