Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33463014›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2021

Predicting sample success for large-scale ancient DNA studies on marine mammals.

Xénia Keighley, Maiken Hemme Bro-Jørgensen, Hans Ahlgren, Paul Szpak, Marta Maria Ciucani, Fátima Sánchez Barreiro, Lesley Howse, Anne Birgitte Gotfredsen, Aikaterini Glykou, Peter Jordan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xénia KeighleySection for Evolutionary Genomics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7994-0414
Maiken Hemme Bro-JørgensenSection for Evolutionary Genomics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1569-7878
Hans AhlgrenArchaeological Research Laboratory, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Paul SzpakDepartment of Anthropology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1364-6834
Marta Maria CiucaniSection for Evolutionary Genomics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8998-4899
Fátima Sánchez BarreiroSection for Evolutionary Genomics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-0052
Lesley HowseArchaeology Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-5833
Anne Birgitte GotfredsenSection for GeoGenetics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Aikaterini GlykouArchaeological Research Laboratory, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter JordanDepartment of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kerstin LidénArchaeological Research Laboratory, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5911-9503
Morten Tange OlsenSection for Evolutionary Genomics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6716-6345

Funding

European Union's Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 #676154Joint Proxies Research Group, financed by Research Council of Norway (RCN) Grant Number 246899 and Faculty for Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, UiT The Arctic University of NorwaySwedish Research Council, Sweden 2015-02151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, nonhuman ancient DNA studies have begun to focus on larger sample sizes and whole genomes, offering the potential to reveal exciting and hitherto unknown answers to ongoing biological and archaeological questions. However, one major limitation to such studies is the substantial financial and time investments still required during sample screening, due to uncertainty regarding successful sample selection. This study investigates the effect of a wide range of sample properties including latitude, sample age, skeletal element, collagen preservation, and context on endogenous content and DNA damage profiles for 317 ancient and historic pinniped samples collected from across the North Atlantic and surrounding regions. Using generalised linear and mixed-effect models, we found that a range of factors affected DNA preservation within each of the species under consideration. The most important findings were that endogenous content varied significantly within species according to context, the type of skeletal element, the collagen content and collection year. There also appears to be an effect of the sample's geographic origin, with samples from the Arctic generally showing higher endogenous content and lower damage rates. Both latitude and sample age were found to have significant relationships with damage levels, but only for walrus samples. Sex, ontogenetic age and extraction material preparation were not found to have any significant relationship with DNA preservation. Overall, skeletal element and sample context were found to be the most influential factors and should therefore be considered when selecting samples for large-scale ancient genome studies.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientAnimalsAquatic OrganismsArchaeologyArctic RegionsCaniformiaDNA, AncientaDNADNA damageendogenous contentpinnipedssample agesealwalruszooarchaeology

Identifiers

PMID33463014
PMCPMC8248401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.