Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33462745›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Auditory processing disorder in children: the value of a multidisciplinary assessment.

Isabelle Rouillon, Aude de Lamaze, Marlène Ribot, Gregory Collet, Théodora de Bollardière, Razane Elmir, Marine Parodi, Sophie Achard, Françoise Denoyelle, Natalie Loundon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabelle RouillonPediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France. isabelle.rouillon@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8051-468X
Aude de LamazePediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France.
Marlène RibotPediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France.
Gregory ColletCenter for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Théodora de BollardièrePediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France.
Razane ElmirPediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France.
Marine ParodiPediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France.
Sophie AchardPediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France.
Françoise DenoyellePediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France.
Natalie LoundonPediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department, APHP, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France.
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAuditory processing disorder (APD) may affect 0.2-5% of the paediatric population. The diagnosis of APD remains difficult because of polymorphic symptoms possibly entangled with other difficulties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new multi-disciplinary assessment in the French language.

methodsThe battery of tests was composed of: (a) APD targeted speech assessment: speech perception in noise, a dichotic test, temporal processing tests (patterns); (b) Psychometric assessment: sustained auditory attention, sustained visual attention, evaluation of cognitive functions; (c) phonemic identification and discrimination; (d) ENT examination, tonal and vocal audiometry and ABR recordings. The diagnosis was made if two of the targeted speech tests were 2 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean or if only one of the tests was 3 SDs below. The auditory attention tests, as well as the phonemic identification and discrimination tests were complementary to the diagnostic battery. However, they did not allow for the diagnosis of APD.

results50 children suspected of APD benefited from this protocol, and 12 were excluded from the study. A diagnosis of APD was confirmed in 17 children (45%). 59% of the patients had associated disorders. The most effective tests for diagnosing APD were dichotic testing (p = 0.001) and pattern recognition (frequency, p = 0.001). The sustained auditory attention test (p = 0.01) and the phonemic identification and discrimination test reinforced the diagnosis of APD.

conclusionIt seems important to evaluate children suspected of APD with a multi-disciplinary protocol. It makes it possible to diagnose APD children, but also to identify attentional difficulties and cognitive disorders that may be associated.

Indexed as

Auditory Perceptual DisordersSpeech PerceptionChildCognitionHearing TestsHumansNoiseAuditory processing disorder (APD)Behavioral testsChildrenMulti-disciplinary assessmentSpeech-in-noise tests

Identifiers

PMID33462745
OpenAlexW3124534678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.