Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33462601›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

Anomalous Phylogenetic Behavior of Ribosomal Proteins in Metagenome-Assembled Asgard Archaea.

Sriram G Garg, Nils Kapust, Weili Lin, Michael Knopp, Fernando D K Tria, Shijulal Nelson-Sathi, Sven B Gould, Lu Fan, Ruixin Zhu, Chuanlun Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Progress and Challenges in Studying the Ecophysiology of Archaea.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sriram G GargInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nils KapustInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Weili LinPutuo People's Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Michael KnoppInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Fernando D K TriaInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Shijulal Nelson-SathiTransdisciplinary Biology, Computational Biology Laboratory, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Sven B GouldInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lu FanShenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Archaea Geo-Omics, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Ruixin ZhuPutuo People's Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Chuanlun ZhangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Archaea Geo-Omics, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
William F MartinInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DESouthern University of Science and Technology · CNTongji University · CNRajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomic studies permit the exploration of microbial diversity in a defined habitat, and binning procedures enable phylogenomic analyses, taxon description, and even phenotypic characterizations in the absence of morphological evidence. Such lineages include asgard archaea, which were initially reported to represent archaea with eukaryotic cell complexity, although the first images of such an archaeon show simple cells with prokaryotic characteristics. However, these metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) might suffer from data quality problems not encountered in sequences from cultured organisms due to two common analytical procedures of bioinformatics: assembly of metagenomic sequences and binning of assembled sequences on the basis of innate sequence properties and abundance across samples. Consequently, genomic sequences of distantly related taxa, or domains, can in principle be assigned to the same MAG and result in chimeric sequences. The impacts of low-quality or chimeric MAGs on phylogenomic and metabolic prediction remain unknown. Debates that asgard archaeal data are contaminated with eukaryotic sequences are overshadowed by the lack of evidence indicating that individual asgard MAGs stem from the same chromosome. Here, we show that universal proteins including ribosomal proteins of asgard archaeal MAGs fail to meet the basic phylogenetic criterion fulfilled by genome sequences of cultured archaea investigated to date: These proteins do not share common evolutionary histories to the same extent as pure culture genomes do, pointing to a chimeric nature of asgard archaeal MAGs. Our analysis suggests that some asgard archaeal MAGs represent unnatural constructs, genome-like patchworks of genes resulting from assembly and/or the binning process.

Indexed as

Genome, ArchaealMetagenomePhylogenyArchaeaEcosystemEukaryotaEukaryotic CellsEvolution, MolecularGenomicsMetagenomicsRibosomal ProteinsRibosomal Proteinsasgard archaeabinningcandidate phylum radiation (CPR)eukaryogenesismetagenomicsphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID33462601
PMCPMC7813640
OpenAlexW3106064136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.