Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33462583›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2021

Host susceptibility factors render ripe tomato fruit vulnerable to fungal disease despite active immune responses.

Christian J Silva, Casper van den Abeele, Isabel Ortega-Salazar, Victor Papin, Jaclyn A Adaskaveg, Duoduo Wang, Clare L Casteel, Graham B Seymour, Barbara Blanco-Ulate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in CRISPR Plant Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian J SilvaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Casper van den AbeeleDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Isabel Ortega-SalazarDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Victor PapinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Jaclyn A AdaskavegDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Duoduo WangSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Clare L CasteelSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Graham B SeymourSchool of Biosciences, Plant and Crop Science Division, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, UK.
Barbara Blanco-UlateDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased susceptibility of ripe fruit to fungal pathogens poses a substantial threat to crop production and marketability. Here, we coupled transcriptomic analyses with mutant studies to uncover critical processes associated with defense and susceptibility in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit. Using unripe and ripe fruit inoculated with three fungal pathogens, we identified common pathogen responses reliant on chitinases, WRKY transcription factors, and reactive oxygen species detoxification. We established that the magnitude and diversity of defense responses do not significantly impact the interaction outcome, as susceptible ripe fruit mounted a strong immune response to pathogen infection. Then, to distinguish features of ripening that may be responsible for susceptibility, we utilized non-ripening tomato mutants that displayed different susceptibility patterns to fungal infection. Based on transcriptional and hormone profiling, susceptible tomato genotypes had losses in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis, while jasmonic acid accumulation and signaling coincided with defense activation in resistant fruit. We identified and validated a susceptibility factor, pectate lyase (PL). CRISPR-based knockouts of PL, but not polygalacturonase (PG2a), reduced susceptibility of ripe fruit by >50%. This study suggests that targeting specific genes that promote susceptibility is a viable strategy to improve the resistance of tomato fruit against fungal disease.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesPlant ImmunitySolanum lycopersicumBotrytisFruitGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant ProteinsPlant ProteinsBotrytis cinereafruit–pathogen interactionsfruit ripeningFusarium acuminatumimmune responsesnon-ripening mutantspectate lyasepreformed defensesRhizopus stolonifersusceptibility factors

Identifiers

PMID33462583
PMCPMC8006553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.