Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33462529›Full record

ArticleJournal of population economics2021

Socio-demographic factors associated with self-protecting behavior during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Nicholas W Papageorge, Matthew V Zahn, Michèle Belot, Eline van den Broek-Altenburg, Syngjoo Choi, Julian C Jamison, Egon Tripodi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of population economics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterizing population-level changes in human behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas W PapageorgeDepartment of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, IZA and NBER, Balitmore, MD USA.
Matthew V ZahnDepartment of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA.
Michèle BelotDepartment of Economics, Cornell University and IZA, Ithaca, NY USA.
Eline van den Broek-AltenburgLarner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT USA.
Syngjoo ChoiDepartment of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Gwanak-gu South Korea.
Julian C JamisonUniversity of Exeter Business School, Exeter, Devon UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2671-1153
Egon TripodiDepartment of Economics, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the role of human behavior in the spread of disease, it is vital to understand what drives people to engage in or refrain from health-related behaviors during a pandemic. This paper examines factors associated with the adoption of self-protective health behaviors, such as social distancing and mask wearing, at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in the USA. These behaviors not only reduce an individual's own risk of infection but also limit the spread of disease to others. Despite these dual benefits, universal adoption of these behaviors is not assured. We focus on the role of socioeconomic differences in explaining behavior, relying on data collected in April 2020 during the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. The data include information on income, gender and race along with unique variables relevant to the current pandemic, such as work arrangements and housing quality. We find that higher income is associated with larger changes in self-protective behaviors. These gradients are partially explained by the fact that people with less income are more likely to report circumstances that make adopting self-protective behaviors more difficult, such as an inability to tele-work. Both in the USA and elsewhere, policies that assume universal compliance with self-protective measures-or that otherwise do not account for socioeconomic differences in the costs of doing so-are unlikely to be effective or sustainable.

Indexed as

Covid-19HousingIncome inequalitySocial distancingWork arrangements

Identifiers

PMID33462529
PMCPMC7807230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.