Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33462412›Full record

ReviewCell death and differentiation2021

The regulation of necroptosis by post-translational modifications.

Yanxiang Meng, Jarrod J Sandow, Peter E Czabotar, James M Murphy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death and differentiation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A non-classical necroptosis pathway mediated by caspases.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanxiang MengWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7447-9788
Jarrod J SandowWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5684-8236
Peter E CzabotarWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2594-496X
James M MurphyWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. jamesm@wehi.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0195-3949
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1079700Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1124735Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1124737Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1172929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necroptosis is a caspase-independent, lytic form of programmed cell death whose errant activation has been widely implicated in many pathologies. The pathway relies on the assembly of the apical protein kinases, RIPK1 and RIPK3, into a high molecular weight cytoplasmic complex, termed the necrosome, downstream of death receptor or pathogen detector ligation. The necrosome serves as a platform for RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation of the terminal effector, the MLKL pseudokinase, which induces its oligomerization, translocation to, and perturbation of, the plasma membrane to cause cell death. Over the past 10 years, knowledge of the post-translational modifications that govern RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL conformation, activity, interactions, stability and localization has rapidly expanded. Here, we review current knowledge of the functions of phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, GlcNAcylation, proteolytic cleavage, and disulfide bonding in regulating necroptotic signaling. Post-translational modifications serve a broad array of functions in modulating RIPK1 engagement in, or exclusion from, cell death signaling, whereas the bulk of identified RIPK3 and MLKL modifications promote their necroptotic functions. An enhanced understanding of the modifying enzymes that tune RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL necroptotic functions will prove valuable in efforts to therapeutically modulate necroptosis.

Indexed as

NecroptosisProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAnimalsHumansPhosphorylationProtein KinasesReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionMLKL protein, humanProtein KinasesReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesRIPK1 protein, humanRIPK3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33462412
PMCPMC7937688
OpenAlexW3121368050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.