Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33462319›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Effects of cannabis on visual function and self-perceived visual quality.

Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina, Carolina Ortiz, Miriam Casares-López, José R Jiménez, Rosario G Anera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tonic Endocannabinoid Levels Modulate Retinal Signaling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aggressive Driving Behaviours in Cannabis Users. The Influence of Consumer Characteristics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Cannabis and driving ability.Current opinion in psychology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonia Ortiz-PeregrinaDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Edificio Mecenas, Av. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Carolina OrtizDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Edificio Mecenas, Av. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain. ortizh@ugr.es.
Miriam Casares-LópezDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Edificio Mecenas, Av. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
José R JiménezDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Edificio Mecenas, Av. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Rosario G AneraDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Edificio Mecenas, Av. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis is one of the most used drugs of abuse in the world. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of smoking cannabis on vision and to relate these to those perceived by the user. Thirty-one cannabis users participated in this study. Visual function assessment was carried out in a baseline session as well as after smoking cannabis. We evaluated static visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereoacuity, accommodative response, straylight, night-vision disturbances (halos) and pupil size. The participants were also divided into two groups depending on whether they perceived their vision to have worsened after smoking cannabis. A logistic regression analysis was employed to identify which visual test could best predict self-perceived visual effects. The study found that smoking cannabis has significant adverse effects on all the visual parameters analyzed (p < 0.05). Self-perceived visual quality results revealed that about two thirds of the sample think that smoking cannabis impairs their vision. Contrast sensitivity, specifically for the spatial frequency 18 cpd, was identified as the only visual parameter significantly associated with self-perceived visual quality (Odds Ratio: 1.135; p = 0.040). Smoking cannabis is associated with negative effects on visual function. Self-perceived visual quality after smoking cannabis could be related to impaired contrast sensitivity.

Indexed as

AdultCannabisContrast SensitivityFemaleHallucinogensHumansMaleSmokingVision DisordersVision TestsVisual AcuityYoung AdultHallucinogens

Identifiers

PMID33462319
PMCPMC7814053
OpenAlexW3122450159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.