ArticleInfection, disease & health2021
Education and training in infection prevention and control: Exploring support for national standards.
Article in Infection, disease & health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge and practice towards healthcare-associated infection prevention among healthcare workers in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Simulation-based infection prevention and control training for medical and healthcare students: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Building the infection prevention workforce: development, implementation and evaluation of Texas Epidemic Public Health Institute infection prevention and control 300 series.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted personal protective equipment donning and doffing training for health professions students and healthcare workers: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Application of directly observed procedural skills in hospital infection training: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Candidemia chronicles: Retrospective analysis of candidemia epidemiology, species distribution, and antifungal susceptibility patterns in Bahrain.World journal of virology · 2024Article
- The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals on the Strategies, Challenges, and Community Responses to Health System Response and Interventions Towards Lassa Fever Infections and Mortality in Sierra Leone.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Review
- Significance of Ongoing Training and Professional Development in Optimizing Healthcare-associated Infection Prevention and Control.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2024Review
- Risk factors of healthcare-associated infection among healthcare workers in intensive care units: A multicenter cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Key lessons from the COVID-19 public health response in Australia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2023Review
- Personal Protective Equipment: Attitudes and Behaviors Among Nurses at a Single University Medical Center.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes comprise a hierarchy of preventive measures, one of which is appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE). A poor understanding of the role of PPE and sub-optimal use may fail to prevent or even increase pathogen transmission during routine care or an infectious disease outbreak. Variability in delivery and content of IPC and PPE education and training across organisations can lead to confusion, unsafe practice, and lack of confidence among clinicians. In a national survey we explored the perspectives of Australian and New Zealand IPC professionals on the value and feasibility of a national IPC training and monitoring programme to improve and standardise PPE practice and raise the profile of IPC.
methodsA population-based online survey that examined hospital PPE training programmes was distributed to members of three major Australasian organisations representing IPC professionals. Quantitative results of the survey have been reported previously. This paper is a qualitative analysis of responses to two open-ended questions about a national approach to training in IPC and the use of PPE.
resultsMost respondents agreed that standardising IPC and PPE training could achieve more consistent practice nationally, supported through the provision of educational resources. Including competency in the use of PPE in mandatory IPC standards would assist in improving the practice and raising the profile of IPC more generally.
conclusionThe results of this study suggest that that there is support for national programmes and standards for use of PPE in Australia and New Zealand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.