ArticleFertility research and practice2021
Fertility education: what's trending on Instagram.
Article in Fertility research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fertility care in the age of algorithms: opportunities and risks of AI and social media integration in reproductive medicine.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Preferences and recommendations from content creators on carnivore diets: a social media analysis.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- #infertility education on Instagram: A Reliability Analysis in Brazil Using the DISCERN Instrument.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Article
- Information about elective egg freezing on instagram reels: a content review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Evaluating the quality of online fertility nutrition claims.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Instagram as a Tool to Improve Human Histology Learning in Medical Education: Descriptive Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- #infertility in Brazil: an analysis of authorship and post content on Instagram.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2024Article
- TikTok as a Resource for Fertility Information and Support: A Patient Survey.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2024Article
- Oocyte cryopreservation on TikTok and Instagram: Who is teaching whom?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Fertility education on Instagram: advertisements vs. educational content analysis for posts in Bahasa (Indonesian language).Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Perineal lacerations and social media: can patients find reliable information on Instagram and TikTok?International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- How effective is digital educational content in shaping fertility awareness? An interventional, cross-sectional study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Ophthalmology and Social Media: An In-Depth Investigation of Ophthalmologic Content on Instagram.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Algorithms, allyship, and advice: A qualitative analysis of fertility tracker marketing.Digital healthArticle
- Randomized control trial of a decision aid for women considering elective egg freezing: The Eggsurance study protocol.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the prevalence, authorship, and types of fertility-related information shared on Instagram targeted toward a new patient interested in fertility options using hashtag and content analysis. Secondary outcomes included comparison of post content stratified by author type (physicians versus patients).
methodsA list of ten hashtags consisting of fertility terms for the new patient was derived. Content analysis was performed in April 2019 on the top 50 and most recent 50 posts for each hashtag to determine authorship and content type. The distribution of fertility terms in posts made by physicians was compared to that of patients and differences in use of terms were analyzed.
resultsOur search yielded 3,393,636 posts. The two most popular hashtags were IVF (N = 912,049), and Infertility (N = 852,939). Authorship of the top posts for each hashtag (N = 1000) were as follows: patients (67 %), physicians (10 %), for-profit commercial groups (6.0 %), allied health professional (4.5 %), professional societies (1 %), and other (11 %). Of these posts, 60 % related to patient experiences, 10 % advertisements, 10 % outreach, and 8 % educational. Physicians were more likely to author posts related to oocyte cryopreservation compared to IVF, while patients were more likely to author posts about IVF (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsOver 3 million posts related to fertility were authored on Instagram. A majority of fertility posts are being mobilized by patients to publicly display and share their personal experiences. Concurrent with the rising utilization of planned oocyte cryopreservation, there is a trend toward physicians educating their patients about the process using social media as a platform. Physician participation on social media may offer a low-cost platform for networking and connecting with patients. Future studies examining the educational quality of posts by author type should be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.