Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33461611›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2021

Diagnosis and treatment of Rosai-Dorfman disease of the spine: a systematic literature review.

Pan-Pan Hu, Feng Wei, Xiao-Guang Liu, Zhong-Jun Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rosai-Dorfman disease of the cauda equina: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pan-Pan HuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Feng WeiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. puth_wf@163.com.
Xiao-Guang LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhong-Jun LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review and summarize the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment strategies, and prognosis of spinal Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD).

methodsRDD is also termed as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. We searched the databases of PubMed, Elsevier ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and OVID. The keywords were Rosai-Dorfman disease and spine/central nervous system. Research articles and case reports with accessibility to full texts regarding spinal RDD were eligible for the inclusion. A total of 62 articles were included, and they contained 69 cases. We extracted the information of interest and analyzed them using SPSS statistics package.

resultsThe average age was 33.1 ± 18.3 years. The ratio of males to females was 1.9/1. Overall, 63 cases presented with spine-related symptoms. A total of 27 cases (39.1%) had multi-organ lesions, and 12 cases had records of massive lymphadenopathy. Among 47 cases who first manifested spine-related symptoms, 93.6% were preoperatively misdiagnosed. The disease had a predilection for cervical spine (38.8%) and thoracic spine (40.3%). 62.9% of lesions were dura-based. Surgery remained the mainstream treatment option (78.8%), with or without adjuvant therapies. Total lesion resection was achieved in 34.8% of cases. The rate of lesion recurrence/progression was 19.5%, which was marginally lower for total resection than for non-total resection.

conclusionSpinal RDD has no pathognomonic clinical and imaging features. Most cases first present with spine-relevant symptoms. Massive lymphadenopathy is not common, but a tendency for multi-organ involvement should be considered. Spinal RDD has a high recurrence rate; thus, total resection is the treatment of choice. Adjuvant therapies are indicated for multi-organ lesions and residual lesions. A wait and watch strategy is recommended for asymptomatic patients. Herein, a workflow of diagnosis and treatment of the spinal RDD is established.

Indexed as

Histiocytosis, SinusAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRecurrenceYoung AdultClinical featuresLiterature reviewRosai-Dorfman diseaseSpineTreatment

Identifiers

PMID33461611
PMCPMC7814441
OpenAlexW3124738355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.