Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33461580›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2021

Neuropilin 1 and Neuropilin 2 gene invalidation or pharmacological inhibition reveals their relevance for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Aurore Dumond, Etienne Brachet, Jérôme Durivault, Valérie Vial, Anna K Puszko, Yves Lepelletier, Christopher Montemagno, Marina Pagnuzzi-Boncompagni, Olivier Hermine, Christiane Garbay and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neuropilin (NRPs) Related Pathological Conditions and Their Modulators.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Aurore DumondScientific Center of Monaco, Biomedical Department, 8 Quai Antoine Ier, MC-98000, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Etienne BrachetUniversité de Paris, CiTCoM, UMR 8038 CNRS, F-75006, Paris, France.
Jérôme DurivaultScientific Center of Monaco, Biomedical Department, 8 Quai Antoine Ier, MC-98000, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Valérie VialScientific Center of Monaco, Biomedical Department, 8 Quai Antoine Ier, MC-98000, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Anna K PuszkoFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland.
Yves LepelletierINSERM UMR 1163, Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Normal Hematopoiesis and Hematological Disorders: Therapeutical Implications, F-75015, Paris, France.
Christopher MontemagnoScientific Center of Monaco, Biomedical Department, 8 Quai Antoine Ier, MC-98000, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Marina Pagnuzzi-BoncompagniScientific Center of Monaco, Biomedical Department, 8 Quai Antoine Ier, MC-98000, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Olivier HermineINSERM UMR 1163, Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Normal Hematopoiesis and Hematological Disorders: Therapeutical Implications, F-75015, Paris, France.
Christiane GarbayUniversité de Paris, LCBPT, UMR8601 CNRS, UFR Biomédicale des Saints-Pères, F-75006, Paris, France.
Nathalie LagardeLaboratoire GBCM EA7528, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, HESAM Université, 2 Rue Conté, 75003, Paris, France.
Matthieu MontesLaboratoire GBCM EA7528, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, HESAM Université, 2 Rue Conté, 75003, Paris, France.
Luc DemangeUniversité de Paris, CiTCoM, UMR 8038 CNRS, F-75006, Paris, France.
Renaud GrépinScientific Center of Monaco, Biomedical Department, 8 Quai Antoine Ier, MC-98000, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Gilles PagèsScientific Center of Monaco, Biomedical Department, 8 Quai Antoine Ier, MC-98000, Monaco, Principality of Monaco. Gilles.Pages@unice.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-5610

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer SunitresLigue Contre le Cancer Equipe Labellisée
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the improvement of relapse-free survival mediated by anti-angiogenic drugs like sunitinib (Sutent®), or by combinations of anti-angiogenic drugs with immunotherapy, metastatic clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (mccRCC) remain incurable. Hence, new relevant treatments are urgently needed. The VEGFs coreceptors, Neuropilins 1, 2 (NRP1, 2) are expressed on several tumor cells including ccRCC. We analyzed the role of the VEGFs/NRPs signaling in ccRCC aggressiveness and evaluated the relevance to target this pathway.

methodsWe correlated the NRP1, 2 levels to patients' survival using online available data base. Human and mouse ccRCC cells were knocked-out for the NRP1 and NRP2 genes by a CRISPR/Cas9 method. The number of metabolically active cells was evaluated by XTT assays. Migration ability was determined by wound closure experiments and invasion ability by using Boyden chamber coated with collagen. Production of VEGFA and VEGFC was evaluated by ELISA. Experimental ccRCC were generated in immuno-competent/deficient mice. The effects of a competitive inhibitor of NRP1, 2, NRPa-308, was tested in vitro and in vivo with the above-mentioned tests and on experimental ccRCC. NRPa-308 docking was performed on both NRPs.

resultsKnock-out of the NRP1 and NRP2 genes inhibited cell metabolism and migration and stimulated the expression of VEGFA or VEGFC, respectively. NRPa-308 presented a higher affinity for NRP2 than for NRP1. It decreased cell metabolism and migration/invasion more efficiently than sunitinib and the commercially available NRP inhibitor EG00229. NRPa-308 presented a robust inhibition of experimental ccRCC growth in immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice. Such inhibition was associated with decreased expression of several pro-tumoral factors. Analysis of the TCGA database showed that the NRP2 pathway, more than the NRP1 pathway correlates with tumor aggressiveness only in metastatic patients.

conclusionsOur study strongly suggests that inhibiting NRPs is a relevant treatment for mccRCC patients in therapeutic impasses and NRPa-308 represents a relevant hit.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Renal CellCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationFemaleGene Knockout TechniquesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMiceModels, MolecularNeoplasm MetastasisNeuropilin-1Neuropilin-2Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysNeuropilin-1Neuropilin-2neuropilin-2, humanNRP1 protein, humanCancerccRCCImmunologyNeuropilinsOncology

Identifiers

PMID33461580
PMCPMC7812727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.