Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33461560›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Quantifying individual variability in exposure risk to mosquito bites in the Cascades region, Burkina Faso.

Federica Guglielmo, Antoine Sanou, Thomas Churcher, Heather M Ferguson, Hilary Ranson, Ellie Sherrard-Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica GuglielmoVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. Federica.Guglielmo@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1434-2194
Antoine SanouInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. saantoinebf@gmail.com.
Thomas ChurcherMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Heather M FergusonInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Hilary RansonVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Ellie Sherrard-SmithMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, W2 1PG, UK. e.sherrard-smith@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme · BFUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 200222/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cascades region, Burkina Faso, has a high malaria burden despite reported high insecticide-treated mosquito net (ITN) use. Human and vector activities outside the hours when indoor interventions offer direct protection from infectious bites potentially increase exposure risk to bites from malaria-transmitting Anopheles mosquitoes. This work investigated the degree of variation in human behaviour both between individuals and through time (season) to quantify how it impacts exposure to malaria vectors.

methodsPatterns in human overnight activity (18:00-06:00) to quantify time spent using an ITN across 7 successive nights in two rural communities, Niakore (N = 24 participants) and Toma (71 participants), were observed in the dry and rainy seasons, between 2017 and 2018. Hourly human landing Anopheles mosquito catches were conducted in Niakore specifically, and Cascades region generally, between 2016 and 2017. Data were statistically combined to estimate seasonal variation in time spent outdoors and Anopheles bites received per person per night (bpppn).

resultsSubstantial variability in exposure to outdoor Anopheles bites was detected within and between communities across seasons. In October, when Anopheles densities are highest, an individual's risk of Anopheles bites ranged from 2.2 to 52.2 bites per person per night (bpppn) within the same week with variable risk dependent on hours spent indoors. Comparably higher outdoor human activity was observed in April and July but, due to lower Anopheles densities estimated, bpppn were 0.2-4.7 and 0.5-32.0, respectively. Males and people aged over 21 years were predicted to receive more bites in both sentinel villages.

conclusionThis work presents one of the first clear descriptions of the degree of heterogeneity in time spent outdoors between people and across the year. Appreciation of sociodemographic, cultural and entomological activities will help refine approaches to vector control.

Indexed as

BehaviorIndividualityAdolescentAdultAnimalsAnophelesBurkina FasoChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInsect Bites and StingsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID33461560
PMCPMC7814650
OpenAlexW3116780583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.