Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33461519›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Mobilising people as assets for active ageing promotion: a multi-stakeholder perspective on peer volunteering initiatives.

Afroditi Stathi, Janet Withall, Sandra Agyapong-Badu, Eva Barrett, Marlene Kritz, Debbie Wills, Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani, Kenneth R Fox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Changes in Volunteering of Older Adults in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Motivations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Afroditi StathiSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. a.stathi@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-777X
Janet WithallDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Sandra Agyapong-BaduSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Eva BarrettSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Marlene KritzSchool of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Debbie WillsSt. Monica Trust, Bristol, UK.
Cecilie Thogersen-NtoumaniSchool of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Kenneth R FoxSchool of Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Curtin University · AUUniversity of Bath · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IESt Monica Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful peer volunteering is central to many community-based, active ageing initiatives. This study synthesises the perspectives of a range of stakeholders involved in peer volunteering initiatives and provides recommendations as to how peer volunteers can be effectively mobilised as community assets.

methodsAn evidence synthesis of qualitative data from (a) the evaluation of ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged), a feasibility trial of a peer volunteering active ageing intervention, and (b) interviews with volunteers and managers of third sector organisations providing peer volunteering programmes. Data were analysed using directed content analysis.

resultsTen managers, 22 volunteers and 20 ACE participants were interviewed. The analysis identified six main themes, 33 higher and 22 sub themes. Main themes were: (i) Motives, (ii) Benefits, (iii) Skills and Characteristics, (iv) Challenges, (v) Training Needs, (vi) Recruitment and Retention. Altruism, changes in life circumstances, opportunities to reconnect with the community and personal fulfilment were the main reasons for volunteering. Volunteering was described as being personally rewarding, an avenue to acquire new skills and knowledge, and an opportunity for increased social connections and physical activity. Good peer volunteers are committed, reliable, have a good sense of humour, good interpersonal skills and are able to relate to participants. When pairing volunteers with participants, shared interests and geographical proximity are important to consider. Clarity of role, level of time commitment, regular feedback, recognition of effort and strong networks for on-going support are important strategies to facilitate volunteer retention.

conclusionsThe findings of this study support the value of peer volunteering as a strategy for mobilising community assets in promoting active ageing. To ensure success and longevity, these schemes require appropriate funding and efficient administrative support.

Indexed as

AgingVolunteersExerciseHumansPeer GroupCommunityHealth promotionPhysical activityQualitative synthesisVolunteering

Identifiers

PMID33461519
PMCPMC7812118
OpenAlexW3113362948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.