ArticleInternational journal of psychiatry in medicine2022
Predictors of completion and response to a psychological intervention to promote health behavior adherence in heart failure.
Article in International journal of psychiatry in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMost individuals with heart failure (HF) struggle to adhere to one or more health behaviors, and interventions to promote adherence are time-intensive and costly. In this analysis, we examined the predictors of engagement and response related to a telephone-delivered health behavior intervention for individuals with HF.
methodUsing data from two pilot trials (N = 25) of a behavioral intervention for individuals with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II HF, we examined predictors of intervention engagement and response using linear and mixed effects regression analyses. Predictors included medical (NYHA class, physical health-related quality of life [HRQoL], and HF symptoms) and intervention (ease and usefulness/utility ratings of the first intervention exercise) characteristics. Outcomes included percentage of sessions completed, accelerometer-measured physical activity, and sodium intake.
resultsLower physical HRQoL and more frequent HF symptoms were associated with completion of more sessions. In contrast, more frequent HF symptoms and higher NYHA class were associated with less physical activity improvement. Finally, participants' ratings of the first session's utility were associated with greater improvements in physical activity at follow-up.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that while individuals with greater functional impairment are more engaged in a behavioral intervention, they may be less able to increase physical activity in response to the program. Furthermore, the perceived utility of an initial session may predict longer-term behavior change. Larger studies are needed to clarify the presence of additional predictors and determine how they can be used to better tailor health behavior interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.