Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33461060›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Why is appropriate healthcare inaccessible for many European breast cancer patients? - The EBCC 12 manifesto.

Fatima Cardoso, Fiona MacNeill, Frederique Penault-Llorca, Alexandru Eniu, Francesco Sardanelli, Elizabeth Bergsten Nordström, Philip Poortmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatima CardosoBreast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/ Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. Electronic address: fatimacardoso@fundacaochampalimaud.pt.
Fiona MacNeillRoyal Marsden Hospital London, Division of Breast Surgery (UEMS), UK. Electronic address: fiona.macneill@rmh.nhs.uk.
Frederique Penault-LlorcaJean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Research Unit INSERM, Clermont-Ferrand, 1240, France. Electronic address: Frederique.PENAULT-LLORCA@clermont.unicancer.fr.
Alexandru EniuCancer Institute Ion Chiricuta, Department of Breast Tumors, Day Hospital Unit, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Hopital Riviera-Chablais, Switzerland. Electronic address: alexandru.eniu@hopitalrivierachablais.ch.
Francesco SardanelliUniversità Degli Studi di Milano, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Department of Radiology, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: francesco.sardanelli@unimi.it.
Elizabeth Bergsten NordströmSwedish Breast Cancer Association, Europa Donna, Sweden. Electronic address: elizabeth.bergsten.nordstrom@gmail.com.
Philip PoortmansIridium Kankernetwerk and University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: philip.poortmans@gza.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Europe, inappropriate reimbursement and funding rules and regulations act as disincentives to best breast cancer care or, at worst, hinder best care. This problem was the focus of the 12th European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC) manifesto, discussed during the virtual conference. As patient involvement is indispensable in driving changes to clinical practice, Europa Donna the European patient advocacy group was closely involved in the 12th manifesto. Reimbursement policies have rarely evolved with advances in breast cancer care such as outpatient (ambulatory) care rather than inpatient admission, use of oral or subcutaneous anti-cancer drugs rather than day-hospital intravenous administration, oncoplastic surgery techniques to minimize mastectomy rates, breast reconstructive surgery, risk-reducing surgery for BRCA mutation carriers, or use of hypo-fractionated breast radiation therapy. Although each European country, region and centre will have to understand how their reimbursement policies may hinder best care and find their own solutions, the problems are similar throughout Europe and some solutions can be broadly applied. This manifesto is not calling for more funding or demanding changes that will result in more expensive care. Reimbursement, if better aligned with guidelines and optimal clinical practice, will deliver more cost-effective healthcare. This will release resources, support more equitable use of finite funding and resources, so allowing more European breast cancer patients to benefit from evidence-based treatment recommended by national and international guidelines.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyDelivery of Health CareEuropeFemaleHumansMastectomyAccessBreast cancerClinical practice guidelinesHealthcare reimbursement rulesInequalitiesManifesto

Identifiers

PMID33461060
PMCPMC7817501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.