SynthesisSeizure2021
Can antiepileptic efficacy and epilepsy variables be studied from electronic health records? A review of current approaches.
Synthesis in Seizure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Modern generative large language models in epilepsy care: a scoping review of current applications, challenges, and future directions.Acta epileptologica · 2026Review
- Long-term epilepsy outcome dynamics revealed by natural language processing of clinic notes.Epilepsia · 2023Article
- Article
- Harnessing the power of the electronic health record for ALS research and quality improvement: CReATe CAPTURE-ALS and the ALS Toolkit.Muscle & nerve · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As automated data extraction and natural language processing (NLP) are rapidly evolving, improving healthcare delivery by harnessing large data is garnering great interest. Assessing antiepileptic drug (AED) efficacy and other epilepsy variables pertinent to healthcare delivery remain a critical barrier to improving patient care. In this systematic review, we examined automatic electronic health record (EHR) extraction methodologies pertinent to epilepsy. We also reviewed more generalizable NLP pipelines to extract other critical patient variables. Our review found varying reports of performance measures. Whereas automated data extraction pipelines are a crucial advancement, this review calls attention to standardizing NLP methodology and accuracy reporting for greater generalizability. Moreover, the use of crowdsourcing competitions to spur innovative NLP pipelines would further advance this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.