ArticleNeuroImage2021
Retrospective motion artifact correction of structural MRI images using deep learning improves the quality of cortical surface reconstructions.
Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of FatNav-Based Prospective Motion Correction for Perivascular Space Imaging With T2-Weighted MRI at 7 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Optimization of Respiratory Training Methods for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- MRecover: A Conditional Generative Model for Recovering Motion- Corrupted MR images Using AI Generated Contrast.Research square · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Brain MRI Artifact Correction: Current Challenges and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- DEEP-DISORDER: Motion Correction in 3D MRI via Segment Reconstruction and Registration.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Brain MRI Dataset Featuring a Full Clinical Protocol With and Without Intentional Motion.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Performance of a GPU- and time-efficient pseudo-3D network for magnetic resonance image super-resolution and motion artifact reduction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Iterative learning for joint image denoising and motion artifact correction of 3D brain MRI.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- A network-assisted joint image and motion estimation approach for robust 3D MRI motion correction across severity levels.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Res-MoCoDiff: residual-guided diffusion models for motion artifact correction in brain MRI.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Accuracies of four simulation approaches in reproducing motion artifacts and morphometric parameter biases.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Res-MoCoDiff: Residual-guided diffusion models for motion artifact correction in brain MRI.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Addressing artifactual bias in large, automated MRI analyses of brain development.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- A foundation model for enhancing magnetic resonance images and downstream segmentation, registration and diagnostic tasks.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- AI for image quality and patient safety in CT and MRI.European radiology experimental · 2025Review
- Article
- Investigating the Use of Generative Adversarial Networks-Based Deep Learning for Reducing Motion Artifacts in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Radiology: Savior or False Hope?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Effects of prospective motion correction on perivascular spaces at 7T MRI evaluated using motion artifact simulation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Head motion during MRI acquisition presents significant challenges for neuroimaging analyses. In this work, we present a retrospective motion correction framework built on a Fourier domain motion simulation model combined with established 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. Quantitative evaluation metrics were used to validate the method on three separate multi-site datasets. The 3D CNN was trained using motion-free images that were corrupted using simulated artifacts. CNN based correction successfully diminished the severity of artifacts on real motion affected data on a separate test dataset as measured by significant improvements in image quality metrics compared to a minimal motion reference image. On the test set of 13 image pairs, the mean peak signal-to-noise-ratio was improved from 31.7 to 33.3 dB. Furthermore, improvements in cortical surface reconstruction quality were demonstrated using a blinded manual quality assessment on the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) dataset. Upon applying the correction algorithm, out of a total of 617 images, the number of quality control failures was reduced from 61 to 38. On this same dataset, we investigated whether motion correction resulted in a more statistically significant relationship between cortical thickness and Parkinson's disease. Before correction, significant cortical thinning was found to be restricted to limited regions within the temporal and frontal lobes. After correction, there was found to be more widespread and significant cortical thinning bilaterally across the temporal lobes and frontal cortex. Our results highlight the utility of image domain motion correction for use in studies with a high prevalence of motion artifacts, such as studies of movement disorders as well as infant and pediatric subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.