Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33460468›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021

Longitudinal effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and related neuropathy on health utility in stage II and III colon cancer patients: A prospective cohort study.

Gabrielle Jongeneel, Marjolein J E Greuter, Felice N van Erning, Jos W R Twisk, Miriam Koopman, Cornelis J A Punt, Geraldine R Vink, Veerle M H Coupé

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Early Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Risk-Based Selection Strategies for Adjuvant Treatment in Stage II Colon Cancer: The Potential Value of Prognostic Molecular Markers.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gabrielle JongeneelDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9462-2246
Marjolein J E GreuterDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Felice N van ErningDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Miriam KoopmanUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J A PuntJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Geraldine R VinkDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Veerle M H CoupéDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLUtrecht University · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

ZonMw 848015007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient's quality of life should be included in clinical decision making regarding the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in stage II/III colon cancer. Therefore, quality of life, summarized as health utility (HU), was evaluated for patients treated with and without ACT. Furthermore, the role of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) on HU was evaluated. Patients diagnosed with stage II/III colon cancer between 2011 and 2019 and participating in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort were included (n = 914). HU scores were assessed with the EQ-5D-5L at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Patients treated with ACT received mainly capecitabine and oxaliplatin (57%) or capecitabine monotherapy (40%) (average duration: 3.5 months). HU 3 to 18 months after diagnosis (potential ACT period + 12 months follow-up) was compared between patients treated with and without ACT using a mixed model adjusted for age, sex and education level. Subsequently, the CIPN sensory, motor and autonomy scales, measured using the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20, were independently included in the model to evaluate the impact of neuropathy. Using a mixed model, a significant difference of -0.039 (95% confidence interval: -0.062; -0.015) in HU was found between patients treated with and without ACT. Including the CIPN sensory, motor and autonomy scales decreased the difference with 0.019, 0.015 and 0.02, respectively. HU 3 to 18 months after diagnosis is significantly lower in patients treated with ACT vs without ACT. This difference is on the boundary of clinical relevance and appears to be partly related to the sensory and motor neuropathy-related side effects of ACT.

Indexed as

AgedCapecitabineChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Decision-MakingColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOxaliplatinPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeCapecitabineOxaliplatinadjuvant chemotherapycolon cancerlongitudinal dataquality of life

Identifiers

PMID33460468
PMCPMC8048818
OpenAlexW3124664069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.