ArticleAmerican journal of physical anthropology2021
Uncloaking a Lost Cause: Decolonizing ancestry estimation in the United States.
Article in American journal of physical anthropology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ancestry estimation: Methodological evolution and forensic implications.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Review
- Responding to the call: Population affinity estimation in a South African forensic context of identification - are we helping or harming?Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
- Identification of Population Affinity Using Dental Traits: A Narrative Review in Forensic Odontology.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Overcoming Systemic Barriers in US Forensic Anthropology Education: Considering Underlying Barriers to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Forensic Anthropology.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
- A transdisciplinary integrated approach to improve identification outcomes for decomposed decedents in medicolegal death investigations.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
- Evaluating the accuracy of population-specific versus generic stature estimation regression equations in a South African sample.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring cranial macromorphoscopic variation and classification accuracy in a South African sample.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
- A structural vulnerability approach to older adult suicides: Trends and potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Clark County, NV (2017-2021).Forensic science international. Synergy · 2024Article
- On the persistence of race: Unique skulls and average tissue depths in the practice of forensic craniofacial depiction.Social studies of science · 2023Article
- Ancestry estimation in forensic anthropology: accuracy of the AncesTrees software in a Brazilian sample.Forensic sciences research · 2023Article
- Towards a forensic anthropology of structural vulnerability.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Adapting forensic case reporting to account for marginalization and vulnerability.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the (hu)MANid program for sex and ancestry estimation in a diverse, contemporary CT scan-based sample.Journal of forensic sciences · 2023Article
- Beyond the report: Prospects and challenges in forensic anthropological investigations of structural vulnerability.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Caribbeanist casualties: Interrogating the application of structural vulnerability to forensic anthropology.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- If you see something, say something: Structural vulnerability data and reporting in forensic anthropology casework.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Frontal Sinus Morphological and Dimensional Variation as Seen on Computed Tomography Scans.Biology · 2022Article
- Forensic genetics through the lens of Lewontin: population structure, ancestry and race.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Review
- Textbook typologies: Challenging the myth of the perfect obstetric pelvis.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the professionalization of US-based forensic anthropology in the 1970s, ancestry estimation has been included as a standard part of the biological profile, because practitioners have assumed it necessary to achieve identifications in medicolegal contexts. Simultaneously, forensic anthropologists have not fully considered the racist context of the criminal justice system in the United States related to the treatment of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color; nor have we considered that ancestry estimation might actually hinder identification efforts because of entrenched racial biases. Despite ongoing criticisms from mainstream biological anthropology that ancestry estimation perpetuates race science, forensic anthropologists have continued the practice. Recent years have seen the prolific development of retooled typological approaches with 21st century statistical prowess to include methods for estimating ancestry from cranial morphoscopic traits, despite no evidence that these traits reflect microevolutionary processes or are suitable genetic proxies for population structure; and such approaches have failed to critically evaluate the societal consequences for perpetuating the biological race concept. Around the country, these methods are enculturated in every aspect of the discipline ranging from university classrooms, to the board-certification examination marking the culmination of training, to standard operating procedures adopted by forensic anthropology laboratories. Here, we use critical race theory to interrogate the approaches utilized to estimate ancestry to include a critique of the continued use of morphoscopic traits, and we assert that the practice of ancestry estimation contributes to white supremacy. Based on the lack of scientific support that these traits reflect evolutionary history, and the inability to disentangle skeletal-based ancestry estimates from supporting the biological validity of race, we urge all forensic anthropologists to abolish the practice of ancestry estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.