Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33460321›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational science2021

Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Postmastectomy Lymphedema: A Literature Review.

Kuo Chen, Mikhail Y Sinelnikov, Igor V Reshetov, Petr Timashev, Yuanting Gu, Lan Mu, Pengwei Lu, Yuanyuan Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Engineering ADSCs by manipulating YAP for lymphedema treatment in a mouse tail model.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kuo ChenThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0095-8545
Mikhail Y SinelnikovInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0862-6011
Igor V ReshetovI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Petr TimashevInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Yuanting GuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lan MuPeking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2196-0652
Pengwei LuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5054-7069
Yuanyuan ZhangInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Sechenov University · RUFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNPeking University · CNWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper limb lymphedema is one of the most common complications after breast cancer surgery and radiotherapy. Despite various physical therapy and surgical options available, the impaired lymph fluid drainage may be progressive due to lymphatic vascular insufficiency making treatment more difficulty. Stem cell therapy provides a promising alternative in the treatment of various chronic diseases. The wide applicability of cell therapy has been reviewed throughout literature. This review provides an overview of recent progress in the therapeutic effect of adult stem cells for primary and secondary lymphedema after breast surgery in preclinical studies and clinical cases. We start with a brief introduction about the pathophysiological mechanisms of postmastectomy lymphedema. Regarding existing treatments, we systematically summarize the benefits and limitations of recent progress. Because of their multidirectional differentiation potential and growth factor secretion, stem cell therapy shows promising results in the management of light to severe lymphedema. Increasing evidences have demonstrated a noticeable reduction in postmastectomy lymphedema and increased lymph-angiogenesis after specific stem cell therapy. Current data suggests that stem cell therapy in lymphedema treatment provides reversal of pathological reorganization associated with lymphedema progression. Finally, we propose potential strategies for overcoming the challenges in the development of multipotent progenitor cells for the treatment and prevention of lymphedema in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAnimalsBreast Cancer LymphedemaBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMastectomyMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33460321
PMCPMC7877822
OpenAlexW3049747273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.