Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33459907›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2021

Automated processing of social media content for radiologists: applied deep learning to radiological content on twitter during COVID-19 pandemic.

Shikhar Khurana, Rohan Chopra, Bharti Khurana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shikhar KhuranaM.S. Ramaiah Medical College, M.S. Ramaiah Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560054, India.
Rohan ChopraTrauma Imaging Research and Innovation Center, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Bharti KhuranaTrauma Imaging Research and Innovation Center, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. bkhurana@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-3435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to develop an automated process to analyze multimedia content on Twitter during the COVID-19 outbreak and classify content for radiological significance using deep learning (DL). MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing Twitter search features, all tweets containing keywords from both "radiology" and "COVID-19" were collected for the period January 01, 2020 up to April 24, 2020. The resulting dataset comprised of 8354 tweets. Images were classified as (i) images with text (ii) radiological content (e.g., CT scan snapshots, X-ray images), and (iii) non-medical content like personal images or memes. We trained our deep learning model using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) on training dataset of 1040 labeled images drawn from all three classes. We then trained another DL classifier for segmenting images into categories based on human anatomy. All software used is open-source and adapted for this research. The diagnostic performance of the algorithm was assessed by comparing results on a test set of 1885 images.

resultsOur analysis shows that in COVID-19 related tweets on radiology, nearly 32% had textual images, another 24% had radiological content, and 44% were not of radiological significance. Our results indicated a 92% accuracy in classifying images originally labeled as chest X-ray or chest CT and a nearly 99% accurate classification of images containing medically relevant text. With larger training dataset and algorithmic tweaks, the accuracy can be further improved.

conclusionApplying DL on rich textual images and other metadata in tweets we can process and classify content for radiological significance in real time.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSocial MediaCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2SoftwareCNNCOVID-19Image classificationSocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID33459907
PMCPMC7811945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.