Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33459822›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2021

Dural-based lesions: is it a meningioma?

Vitor Nagai Yamaki, Luis Filipe de Souza Godoy, Gabriela Alencar Bandeira, Leandro Tavares Lucato, Gustavo Correa Lordelo, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla, Iuri Santana Neville, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Wellingson Silva Paiva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The usefulness of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vitor Nagai YamakiDivision of Neurological Surgery, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, Brazil. vitoryamaki@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4872-1731
Luis Filipe de Souza GodoyDivision of Radiology, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriela Alencar BandeiraDivision of Radiology, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leandro Tavares LucatoDivision of Radiology, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Correa LordeloDivision of Neurological Surgery, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Davi Jorge Fontoura SollaDivision of Neurological Surgery, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Iuri Santana NevilleDivision of Neurological Surgery, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Manoel Jacobsen TeixeiraDivision of Neurological Surgery, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellingson Silva PaivaDivision of Neurological Surgery, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMeningiomas are the most common extra-axial intracranial neoplasms with typical radiological findings. In approximately 2% of cases, histopathological reports reveal different neoplasms or non-neoplastic lesions that can closely mimic meningiomas. We describe radiological features of meningioma mimics highlighting imaging red flags to consider a differential diagnosis.

methodsA total of 348 lesions with radiological diagnosis of meningiomas which underwent to surgical treatment or biopsy between December of 2000 and September of 2014 were analyzed. We determined imaging features that are not a typical finding of meningiomas, suggesting other lesions. The following imaging characteristics were evaluated on CT and MRI: (a) bone erosion; (b) hyperintensity on T2WI; (c) hypointensity on T2WI; (d) bone destruction; (e) dural tail; (f) leptomeningeal involvement; (g) pattern of contrast enhancement; (h) dural displacement sign.

resultsWe have a relatively high prevalence of meningioma mimics (7.2%). Dural-based lesions with homogeneous contrast enhancement (52%) are easily misdiagnosed as meningiomas. Most lesions mimic convexity (37.5%) or parafalcine (21.9%) meningiomas. We have determined five imaging red flags that can alert radiologists to consider meningioma mimics: (1) bone erosion (22.2%); (2) dural displacement sign (36%); (3) marked T2 hypointensity (32%); (4) marked T2 hyperintensity (12%); (5) absence of dural tail (48%). The most common mimic lesion in our series was hemangiopericytomas, followed by lymphomas and schwannomas.

conclusionThe prevalence of meningioma mimics is not negligible. It is important to have awareness on main radiological findings suggestive of differential diagnosis due to a wide range of differentials which lead to different prognosis and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

HemangiopericytomaMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeurilemmomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingHemangiopericytomaLymphomaMeningiomaMeningioma mimicsRadiological findingsSchwannoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.