ReviewDer Internist2021
[Treatment of renal artery stenosis in the year 2021].
Review in Der Internist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid severe hypertension and organ damage in two-kidney two-clip rats produced by different sizes of clips.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Endothelial CHOP as a central mechanism in renovascular hypertension-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction and cardiac fibrosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of recurrence in patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans after surgical intervention.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Pickering syndrome in a patient with a single kidney: role of renal artery stenting.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- The impact of renal artery stenting on therapeutic aims.Journal of human hypertension · 2023Review
- Optical coherence microangiography of the mouse kidney for diagnosis of circulatory disorders.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe arteriosclerotic stenosis of the renal artery with at least 60-70% narrowing of the lumen can lead to various diseases: in the case of unilateral stenosis it can lead to renovascular hypertension, in the case of bilateral narrowing (or in a stenotic solitary kidney) also to an often progressive renal insufficiency (ischemic kidney disease) and/or to acute pulmonary edema (pulmonary flash edema). Renal artery stenosis may be treated by revascularization using either percutaneous (balloon angioplasty with or without stenting) or less commonly open surgical procedures, both with excellent primary patency rates of over 90%; however, randomized trials of catheter-based interventions have failed to demonstrate a longer term benefit with respect to blood pressure control and renal function as well as improved overall survival over optimal medicinal management alone. Due to improved clinical outcomes interventional revascularization is justified in cases with critical stenoses and clinical sequelae, such as pulmonary flash edema and progressive renal failure. Careful patient selection is essential to maximize a potential clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.