Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33459711›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2021

Declining Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in People with Dementia from 2000 to 2015: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Nationwide Register-Based Study.

Rachel Underlien Kristensen, Christina Jensen-Dahm, Christiane Gasse, Gunhild Waldemar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel Underlien KristensenDanish Dementia Research Centre (DDRC), Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Christina Jensen-DahmDanish Dementia Research Centre (DDRC), Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Christiane GasseDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Gunhild WaldemarDanish Dementia Research Centre (DDRC), Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown declining use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), medication where risks associated with use outweigh potential benefits in older people. However, the trend in people with dementia remains unknown.

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that the use of PIM has decreased in people with dementia in line with the declining use in the general older population.

methodsRepeated cross-sectional register-based study of the entire Danish population aged ≥65 years (2000: N = 802,106; 2015: N = 1,056,476). PIM was identified using the Danish "Red-yellow-green list". Changes in the use of PIM were examined by calculating the annual prevalence of filling prescriptions for at least one PIM in older people with and without dementia. Characteristics of the study population were examined annually including comorbidity.

resultsFrom 2000 to 2015, the prevalence of PIM use decreased from 54.7%to 43.5%in people with dementia and from 39.5%to 28.8%in people without dementia; the decrease was significant across all age groups and remained so in a sensitivity analysis where antipsychotics were removed. During the same period, comorbidity scores increased in people with and without dementia.

conclusionThe declining use of PIM in people with dementia from 2000 to 2015 parallels the trend in the general older population. The use of PIM decreased despite increasing levels of comorbidity and was not solely attributable to the decreasing use of antipsychotics in people with dementia. However, PIM use remained more widespread in people with dementia who may be more vulnerable to the risks associated with PIM.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaDenmarkFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMalePotentially Inappropriate Medication ListRegistriesDementiainappropriate prescribingpharmacoepidemiologypotentially inappropriate medicationtime trend

Identifiers

PMID33459711
PMCPMC7990423
OpenAlexW3120286459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.