Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33459489›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

Prognostic value of daytime and nighttime blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients according to age and sex.

Francesca Coccina, Anna M Pierdomenico, Jacopo Pizzicannella, Umberto Ianni, Gabriella Bufano, Rosalinda Madonna, Oriana Trubiani, Francesco Cipollone, Sante D Pierdomenico

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesca CoccinaDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Anna M PierdomenicoDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Jacopo PizzicannellaDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Umberto IanniDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Gabriella BufanoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Rosalinda MadonnaDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Oriana TrubianiDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Francesco CipolloneDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Sante D PierdomenicoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "Gabriele d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8038-9076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors assessed the prognostic value of daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP) in adult (≤65 years) or old (> 65 years) women or men with treated hypertension. Cardiovascular outcomes were evaluated in 2264 patients. During the follow-up (mean 10 years), 523 cardiovascular events occurred. After adjustment for covariates, both daytime and nighttime systolic BP were always associated with outcomes, that is, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval per 10 mm Hg increment) 1.22 (1.04-1.43) and 1.20 (1.04-1.37), respectively, in adult women, 1.30 (1.18-1.43) and 1.21 (1.10-1.33), respectively, in adult men, 1.21 (1.10-1.33) and 1.18 (1.07-1.31), respectively, in old women, and 1.16 (1.01-1.33) and 1.28 (1.14-1.44), respectively, in old men. When daytime and nighttime systolic BP were further and mutually adjusted, daytime and nighttime BP had comparable prognostic value in adult and old women, daytime BP remained associated with outcomes in adult men (hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.74 per 10 mm Hg increment), and nighttime BP remained associated with outcomes in old men (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.64 per 10 mm Hg increment). Daytime and nighttime systolic BP have similar prognostic impact in adult and old women with treated hypertension, whereas daytime BP is a stronger predictor of risk in adult men and nighttime BP is a stronger predictor of risk in old men.

Indexed as

HypertensionAdultAgedBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards Modelsadultambulatory blood pressurecardiovascular riskhypertensionoldsex

Identifiers

PMID33459489
PMCPMC8029908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.