ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2020
Infants routine video electroencephalogram findings in a Saudi tertiary hospital.
Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo report the existence and describe the non-epileptic abnormalities, interictal epileptiform discharges, and seizures in routine electroencephalograms (EEGs) of infants in a tertiary hospital out-patient neurophysiology clinics.
methodsThis is a non-interventional, retrospective descriptive study that involved the review of 172 infants` EEGs conducted from July 2018 to June 2019 in King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
resultsTotal of 172 EEGs were reviewed; 152 routine EEGs for infants and 20 neonatal EEGs. Seventy-six (50%) EEGs were reported to be normal. Among the remaining EEGs, 54 were characterized by generalized slow background abnormalities (31.3 %), seven (4%) by background asymmetry, one (0.5%) by generalized low amplitude, and one (0.5 %) by an alternate trace that was dysmature for age. Interictal epileptiform discharges (IED) were present in 75 (43.6%) EEGs and they were focal in 72 (41.8%) EEGs, and generalized spike wave discharges were seen in only 3 (1.7%) EEGs with focal interictal epileptiform discharges. A diagnosis of hypsarrythmia was made from 15 (8.7%) EEGs. There were seizures in 11 (6.4%) EEGs, of which three were in neonates (15% of neonatal EEGs), and 8 in infants (4.6 % of infant EEGs).
conclusionFifty % of routine infants` EEGs had abnormalities and hypsarrythmia was the most common abnormal background associated with seizures. Ictal discharges in form of generalized electrodecremental pattern associated clinically with epileptic spasm was the most common type of seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.