Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33459149›Full record

ReviewMemory (Hove, England)2022

The seven sins of memory: an update.

Daniel L Schacter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Memory (Hove, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Addressing environmental misperceptions for nature recovery.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Unexpected Events Resist Directed Forgetting.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2026
    Article
  8. Current state of 'lost in the mall': implications for expert witness testimony on the reliability of childhood memories.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. New strategies for the cognitive science of dreaming.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Eliminating episodic memory?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Memory and aging across cultures.Current opinion in psychology · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. False memories for ending of events.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel L SchacterDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2460-6061

Funding

EVENT RELATED NEUROIMAGING OF HUMAN MEMORY FORMATIONR01MH060941 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 2000 to 2025
$9.5M
Episodic Retrieval and Problem Solving in AgingR01AG008441 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 1989 to 2022
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG008441NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory serves critical functions in everyday life, but it is also vulnerable to error and illusion. Two decades ago, I proposed that memory errors could be classified into seven basic categories or "sins":

Indexed as

MemoryBiasHumansadaptive functionsConstructive memorymemory errorsmisattributionsuggestibility

Identifiers

PMID33459149
PMCPMC8285452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.