ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2021
Endoscopic management of multiple broken scalpel blades in the gastrointestinal tract: a case report.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The entry of multiple broken scalpel blades into the gastrointestinal tract with involvement of the stomach, ileum, and colon is rare; no such cases have been reported to date. Whether management of multiple sharp foreign bodies is more effective by endoscopy or surgery remains controversial in clinical practice. We herein describe a 23-year-old man with depression who was admitted to our department 36 hours after swallowing multiple scalpel blades. The patient reported abdominal pain and bloody vomit. A radiograph revealed irregular blade-shaped foreign bodies in the abdomen, and computed tomography confirmed foreign bodies in the stomach, mid-distal segment of the ileum, proximal segment of the ascending colon, liver area of the transverse colon, and lumen of the sigmoid colon. Surgery was immediately suggested as the first-choice treatment, but endoscopy was instead performed after a thorough multidisciplinary discussion. All broken scalpel blades were successfully removed with combined gastroscopy and colonoscopy, and the patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful. This case demonstrates the vital importance of multidisciplinary management and endoscopy as an appropriate treatment approach even for multiple sharp foreign bodies in patients without perforation or peritonitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.