ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2022
A transfer learning approach for automatic segmentation of the surgically treated anterior cruciate ligament.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration: An Imaging Atlas of Morphological Features and Healing Trajectories.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Advancement of an automatic segmentation pipeline for metallic artifact removal in post-surgical ACL MRI.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2025Article
- [Segmentation of anterior cruciate ligament images by fusing inflated convolution and residual hybrid attention].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence demonstrates potential to enhance orthopaedic imaging across multiple modalities: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Comprehensive evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging sequences for signal intensity based assessment of anterior cruciate ligament healing following surgical treatment.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024Article
- Approaching expert-level accuracy for differentiating ACL tear types on MRI with deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- LigaNET: A multi-modal deep learning approach to predict the risk of subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury after surgery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Deep learning radiomics-based preoperative prediction of recurrence in chronic rhinosinusitis.iScience · 2023Article
- Automated segmentation of the healed anterior cruciate ligament from TJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023Article
- Quantitative MRI Biomarkers to Predict Risk of Reinjury Within 2 Years After Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration.The American journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Deep Learning-Based Medical Images Segmentation of Musculoskeletal Anatomical Structures: A Survey of Bottlenecks and Strategies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Automated Magnetic Resonance Image Segmentation of Spinal Structures at the L4-5 Level with Deep Learning: 3D Reconstruction of Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Automated Knee MR Images Segmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A deep learning approach for anterior cruciate ligament rupture localization on knee MR images.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Regional Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Signal Intensity After Surgical Treatment.The American journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging enables quantitative assessment of the healing anterior cruciate ligament or graft post-surgery, but its use is constrained by the need for time consuming manual image segmentation. The goal of this study was to validate a deep learning model for automatic segmentation of repaired and reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments. We hypothesized that (1) a deep learning model would segment repaired ligaments and grafts with comparable anatomical similarity to intact ligaments, and (2) automatically derived quantitative features (i.e., signal intensity and volume) would not be significantly different from those obtained by manual segmentation. Constructive Interference in Steady State sequences were acquired of ACL repairs (n = 238) and grafts (n = 120). A previously validated model for intact ACLs was retrained on both surgical groups using transfer learning. Anatomical performance was measured with Dice coefficient, sensitivity, and precision. Quantitative features were compared to ground truth manual segmentation. Automatic segmentation of both surgical groups resulted in decreased anatomical performance compared to intact ACL automatic segmentation (repairs/grafts: Dice coefficient = .80/.78, precision = .79/.78, sensitivity = .82/.80), but neither decrease was statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis: Dice coefficient p = .02, precision p = .09, sensitivity p = .17; Dunn post-hoc test for Dice coefficient: repairs/grafts p = .054/.051). There were no significant differences in quantitative features between the ground truth and automatic segmentation of repairs/grafts (0.82/2.7% signal intensity difference, p = .57/.26; 1.7/2.7% volume difference, p = .68/.72). The anatomical similarity performance and statistical similarities of quantitative features supports the use of this automated segmentation model in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging pipelines, which will accelerate research and provide a step towards clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.